Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33793083›Full record

ArticleACR open rheumatology2021

Development of an Implementation Strategy for Patient Decision Aids in Rheumatoid Arthritis Through Application of the Behavior Change Wheel.

Claire E H Barber, Nicole Spencer, Nick Bansback, Gabrielle L Zimmermann, Linda C Li, Dawn P Richards, Laurie Proulx, Dianne P Mosher, Glen S Hazlewood

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACR open rheumatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Claire E H BarberUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, and Arthritis Research Canada, Richmond, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3062-5488
Nicole SpencerUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Nick BansbackCentre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences at St. Paul's Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, and Arthritis Research Canada, Richmond, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1510-3462
Gabrielle L ZimmermannAlberta Strategy for Patient Oriented Research (SPOR) SUPPORT Unit, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, and University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Linda C LiUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, and Arthritis Research Canada, Richmond, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6280-0511
Dawn P RichardsCanadian Arthritis Patient Alliance.
Laurie ProulxCanadian Arthritis Patient Alliance.
Dianne P MosherUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Glen S HazlewoodUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, and Arthritis Research Canada, Richmond, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7709-3741
University of Calgary · CACanadian Arthritis Patient Alliance · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

Canadian Initiatives for Outcomes in Rheumatology Care (CIORA) NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDecision aids are being developed to support guideline-based rheumatology care in Canada. The study objective was to identify barriers to decision aid use in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) within a behavior change model to inform an implementation strategy.

methodsPerspectives from Canadian health care providers (HCPs) and patients living with RA were obtained on an early RA decision aid and on perceived facilitators and barriers to decision aid implementation. Data were collected through semistructured interviews, transcribed, and then analyzed by inductive thematic analysis. The lessons learned were then mapped to the behavior change wheel COM-B system (C = capability, O = opportunity, and M = motivation interact to influence B = behavior) to inform key elements of a national implementation strategy.

resultsFifteen HCPs and fifteen patients participated. The analysis resulted in five lessons learned: 1) paternalistic decision-making is a dominant practice in early RA, 2) patients need emotional support and access to educational tools to facilitate participation in shared decision-making (SDM), 3) there are many logistical barriers to decision aid implementation in current care models, 4) flexibility is necessary for successful implementation, and 5) HCPs have limited interest in further training opportunities about decision aids. Implementation recommendations included the following: 1) making the decision aids directly available to patients (O) and providing SDM education (C/M), 2) creating an SDM rheumatology curriculum (C/O/M), 3) using "decision coaches" or patient partners as peer support (C/O/M), 4) linking decision aids to "living" rheumatology guidelines (M), and 5) designing trials of patient decision aid/SDM interventions to evaluate patient-important outcomes (O/M).

conclusionA multifaceted strategy is suggested to improve uptake of decision aids.

Identifiers

PMID33793083
PMCPMC8126755
OpenAlexW3146532251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.