Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33792856›Full record

ArticleNeotropical entomology2021

Invasion and Spreading of Drosophila nasuta (Diptera, Drosophilidae) in the Caatinga Biome, Brazil.

Martín Alejandro Montes, Carlos Henrique Campos Bezerra Neves, Alan Felipe Ferreira, Maria de Fátima Severina Dos Santos, Júlia Isabelle Freire Peres Quintas, Gabriely Dias Ângelo Manetta, Paulo Victor de Oliveira, Ana Cristina Lauer Garcia

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neotropical entomology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Martín Alejandro MontesDepto de Biologia, Univ Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Campus Dois Irmãos, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Carlos Henrique Campos Bezerra NevesPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Biológicas (Zoologia), Univ Federal da Paraíba, João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brazil.
Alan Felipe FerreiraPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Biológicas (Zoologia), Univ Federal da Paraíba, João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brazil.
Maria de Fátima Severina Dos SantosCentro Acadêmico de Vitória, Univ Federal de Pernambuco, Vitória de Santo Antão, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Júlia Isabelle Freire Peres QuintasCentro Acadêmico de Vitória, Univ Federal de Pernambuco, Vitória de Santo Antão, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Gabriely Dias Ângelo ManettaUniv Estadual de Feira de Santana, Feira de Santana, Bahia, Brazil.
Paulo Victor de OliveiraUniv Federal do Piauí, Campus Senador Helvídio Nunes de Barros, Picos, Piauí, Brazil.
Ana Cristina Lauer GarciaCentro Acadêmico de Vitória, Univ Federal de Pernambuco, Vitória de Santo Antão, Pernambuco, Brazil. anacristina.garcia@ufpe.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8352-6080
Universidade Federal da Paraíba · BRUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco · BRUniversidade Estadual de Feira de Santana · BRUniversidade Federal do Piauí · BR

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 425274/2018-7
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological invasions are one of the main causes of biodiversity loss, and it is essential to understand the pattern and rate of expansion of invasive species outside their native distribution. In this study, we documented the invasion of the Asian fruit fly, Drosophila nasuta Lamb, in the Caatinga, and measured its geographical distribution in this environment, which covers 11% of the Brazilian territory. We collected drosophilids in eight sites distributed in the north of the Caatinga (in the state of Ceará), in the south (in Bahia), in the east (in Pernambuco), and in the west (in Piauí), as well as in sites in the central area of the biome. Drosophila nasuta occurred in all areas and was one of the most frequently occurring species in half of the sampled sites. We observed greater abundance in areas with arboreal vegetation and a possible preference of this species for areas with higher annual rainfall in the Caatinga. Of all the biomes where D. nasuta is found in Brazil, the area occupied in the Caatinga is the largest documented to date. Our results show D. nasuta's success in invading the Caatinga and the vast area this species has colonized in this biome. The success of this invasion can be explained by the high fertility and short life cycle as well as by the ability of D. nasuta to use different trophic resources.

Indexed as

DrosophilaEcosystemIntroduced SpeciesAnimalsBiodiversityBrazilTreesAbundancebiological invasioninsectstropical dry forest

Identifiers

PMID33792856
OpenAlexW3147715586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.