Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33792791›Full record

ArticlePlanta2021

Large vs small genomes in Passiflora: the influence of the mobilome and the satellitome.

Mariela Sader, Magdalena Vaio, Luiz Augusto Cauz-Santos, Marcelo Carnier Dornelas, Maria Lucia Carneiro Vieira, Natoniel Melo, Andrea Pedrosa-Harand

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Planta, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A single species, different repeatomes? Genomic plasticity in Passiflora foetida L. complex and comparative insights across the subgenus Passiflora.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Satellite DNA Genomics: The Ongoing Story.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Evolution of satDNAs on holocentric chromosomes: insights from hemipteran insects of the genus Mahanarva.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2023
    Article
  15. Annotation of thePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mariela SaderLaboratory of Plant Cytogenetics and Evolution, Department of Botany, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil. mariela.analiasader@ufpe.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8188-2217
Magdalena VaioLaboratory of Plant Genome Evolution and Domestication, Department of Plant Biology, Faculty of Agronomy, University of the Republic, Montevideo, Uruguay.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8377-6485
Luiz Augusto Cauz-SantosGenetics Department, Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1694-2433
Marcelo Carnier DornelasInstituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6710-3050
Maria Lucia Carneiro VieiraGenetics Department, Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0341-5714
Natoniel MeloLaboratory of Biotechnology, Embrapa Semiarid, Petrolina, Pernambuco, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6888-4090
Andrea Pedrosa-HarandLaboratory of Plant Cytogenetics and Evolution, Department of Botany, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5213-4770

Funding

EMBRAPA SEG-02.16.04.007.00.03FACEPE AMD-0128-2.00/17FACEPE IBPG-1086-2.03/15FAPESP (2019/07838-6)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MAIN

conclusionsWhile two lineages of retrotransposons were more abundant in larger Passiflora genomes, the satellitome was more diverse and abundant in the smallest genome analysed. Repetitive sequences are ubiquitous and fast-evolving elements responsible for size variation and large-scale organization of plant genomes. Within Passiflora genus, a tenfold variation in genome size, not attributed to polyploidy, is known. Here, we applied a combined in silico and cytological approach to study the organization and diversification of repetitive elements in three species of this genus representing its known range in genome size variation. Sequences were classified in terms of type and repetitiveness and the most abundant were mapped to chromosomes. We identified long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons as the most abundant elements in the three genomes, showing a considerable variation among species. Satellite DNAs (satDNAs) were less representative, but highly diverse between subgenera. Our results clearly confirm that the largest genome species (Passiflora quadrangularis) presents a higher accumulation of repetitive DNA sequences, specially Angela and Tekay elements, making up most of its genome. Passiflora cincinnata, with intermediate genome and from the same subgenus, showed similarity with P. quadrangularis regarding the families of repetitive DNA sequences, but in different proportions. On the other hand, Passiflora organensis, the smallest genome, from a different subgenus, presented greater diversity and the highest proportion of satDNA. Altogether, our data indicates that while large genomes evolved by an accumulation of retrotransposons, the smallest genome known for the genus has evolved by diversification of different repeat types, particularly satDNAs.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantRetroelementsDNA, SatelliteEvolution, MolecularGenetic VariationPassifloraPhylogenyDNA, SatelliteRetroelementsChromosome evolutionGenome skimmingNGSPassion-fruitRetrotransposonsSatDNA

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.