Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33792745›Full record

ArticleEuropean biophysics journal : EBJ2021

Macromolecular interactions in vitro, comparing classical and novel approaches.

Christophe Velours, Magali Aumont-Nicaise, Stephan Uebel, Patrick England, Adrian Velazquez-Campoy, David Stroebel, Guillaume Bec, Pierre Soule, Christophe Quétard, Christine Ebel and 3 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European biophysics journal : EBJ, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Multifaceted Roles of Ku70/80.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Christophe Velours *Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), 91198, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Magali Aumont-Nicaise *Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), 91198, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Stephan UebelBioorganic Chemistry & Biophysics Core Facility, Max-Planck-Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany.
Patrick EnglandMolecular Biophysics Platform, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France.
Adrian Velazquez-CampoyInstitute of Biocomputation and Physics of Complex Systems (BIFI), Joint Units IQFR-CSIC-BIFI, and GBsC-CSIC-BIFI, Universidad de Zaragoza, 50018, Zaragoza, Spain.
David StroebelInstitut de Biologie de l'Ecole Normale Supérieure (IBENS), Paris, France.
Guillaume BecArchitecture et Réactivité de l'ARN, Université de Strasbourg, Institut de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire (IBMC) du CNRS, Strasbourg, France.
Pierre SouleNanoTemper Technologies GmbH, Munich, Germany.
Christophe QuétardForteBio-Sartorius, Dourdan, France.
Christine EbelUniversité Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, CEA, IBS, Grenoble, France.
Alain RousselArchitecture et Fonction des Macromolécules Biologiques (AFMB), Marseille, France.
Jean-Baptiste CharbonnierUniversité Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), 91198, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Paloma Fernández VarelaUniversité Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), 91198, Gif-sur-Yvette, France. paloma.fernandez-varela@i2bc.paris-saclay.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5078-7102
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRArchitecture et Fonction des Macromolécules Biologiques · FRÉcole Normale Supérieure - PSL · FRInstitut Pasteur · FRMax Planck Institute of Biochemistry · DENanoTemper Technologies (Germany) · DEUniversidad de Zaragoza · ES

Funding

ANR ANR-12-SVSE8-012ARC SLS220120605310French Infrastructure for Integrated Structural Biology ANR-10-INBS-05INCA DomRep PLBIO 2012-280
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biophysical quantification of protein interactions is central to unveil the molecular mechanisms of cellular processes. Researchers can choose from a wide panel of biophysical methods that quantify molecular interactions in different ways, including both classical and more novel techniques. We report the outcome of an ARBRE-MOBIEU training school held in June 2019 in Gif-sur-Yvette, France ( https://mosbio.sciencesconf.org/ ). Twenty European students benefited from a week's training with theoretical and practical sessions in six complementary approaches: (1) analytical ultracentrifugation with or without a fluorescence detector system (AUC-FDS), (2) isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC), (3) size exclusion chromatography coupled to multi-angle light scattering (SEC-MALS), (4) bio-layer interferometry (BLI), (5) microscale thermophoresis (MST) and, (6) switchSENSE. They implemented all these methods on two examples of macromolecular interactions with nanomolar affinity: first, a protein-protein interaction between an artificial alphaRep binder, and its target protein, also an alphaRep; second, a protein-DNA interaction between a DNA repair complex, Ku70/Ku80 (hereafter called Ku), and its cognate DNA ligand. We report the approaches used to analyze the two systems under study and thereby showcase application of each of the six techniques. The workshop provided students with improved understanding of the advantages and limitations of different methods, enabling future choices concerning approaches that are most relevant or informative for specific kinds of sample and interaction.

Indexed as

CalorimetryDNAHumansLigandsMacromolecular SubstancesProteinsDNALigandsMacromolecular SubstancesProteinsArtificial bindersDouble-stranded DNA breaks repair factorsMacromolecular interactionsMolecular scale biophysics

Identifiers

PMID33792745
OpenAlexW3148113108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.