Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33792743›Full record

ReviewDer Urologe. Ausg. A2021

[Risk-adapted prostate cancer screening-update 2021].

R Al-Monajjed, C Arsov, P Albers

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

R Al-MonajjedMedizinische Fakultät, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Klinik für Urologie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Deutschland. Rouvier.Al-Monajjed@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.
C ArsovMedizinische Fakultät, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Klinik für Urologie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
P AlbersMedizinische Fakultät, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Klinik für Urologie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
Düsseldorf University Hospital · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProstate cancer (PCa) is the most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death in men in industrialized countries. There is no commonly accepted prostate cancer screening strategy. Based on the experience of various international screening studies, the German Prostate Cancer Early Detection Study Based on a Baseline PSA Value in Young Men (PROBASE) was established in 2014.

objectiveBased on the positive results of retrospective cohort analyses, the PROBASE study is designed to demonstrate that a screening strategy based on risk stratification by a baseline prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level at age 45 or 50 years may be an alternative to population-based screening. PROBASE is presented in the context of other risk-adapted screening studies. MATERIALS AND

methodsThere are basically several approaches to improve the population-based screening of PCa. Known risk factors for prostate cancer are age, a certain genetic predisposition (BRCA 1/2) and other germline mutations as well as individual somatic mutations.

resultsA total of 23,301 participants were randomized to study arm A. Baseline PSA testing in study arm A categorized 89.18% of participants into the low-risk group, 9.32% into the intermediate-risk group, and 1.48% into the high-risk group. Thus, the risk assignment exactly matched the previously reported distribution. DISCUSSION: Baseline PSA-dependent, risk-adapted PSA screening has the potential to reduce the high incidence of overdiagnosis and ultimately overtreatment of insignificant prostate cancers of population-based screening through extended testing intervals in the low-risk group. In parallel with PROBASE, several risk-adapted screening strategies are currently being tested worldwide; the evaluation of which is also awaited in several years.

Indexed as

Prostate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRetrospective StudiesProstate-Specific AntigenActive SurveillanceBRCAmpMRTNeoplasm metastasisProstate-specific antigen

Identifiers

PMID33792743
OpenAlexW3143628784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.