Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33792737›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2021

MRI index lesion radiomics and machine learning for detection of extraprostatic extension of disease: a multicenter study.

Renato Cuocolo, Arnaldo Stanzione, Riccardo Faletti, Marco Gatti, Giorgio Calleris, Alberto Fornari, Francesco Gentile, Aurelio Motta, Serena Dell'Aversana, Massimiliano Creta and 5 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Clinical application of machine learning models in patients with prostate cancer before prostatectomy.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024
    Observational
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Renato Cuocolo *Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Arnaldo Stanzione *Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Riccardo FalettiDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Radiology Unit, University of Turin, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Marco GattiDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Radiology Unit, University of Turin, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy. marcogatti17@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8168-5280
Giorgio CallerisDivision of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Molinette Hospital, University of Turin, Torino, Italy.
Alberto FornariRadiology Unit, Mauriziano Umberto I Hospital, 10128, Turin, Italy.
Francesco GentileDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Radiology Unit, University of Turin, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Aurelio MottaDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Radiology Unit, University of Turin, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Serena Dell'AversanaDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Massimiliano CretaDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Nicola LongoDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Paolo GonteroDivision of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Molinette Hospital, University of Turin, Torino, Italy.
Stefano CirilloRadiology Unit, Mauriziano Umberto I Hospital, 10128, Turin, Italy.
Paolo FonioDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Radiology Unit, University of Turin, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Massimo ImbriacoDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo build a machine learning (ML) model to detect extraprostatic extension (EPE) of prostate cancer (PCa), based on radiomics features extracted from prostate MRI index lesions.

methodsConsecutive MRI exams of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for PCa were retrospectively collected from three institutions. Axial T2-weighted and apparent diffusion coefficient map images were annotated to obtain index lesion volumes of interest for radiomics feature extraction. Data from one institution was used for training, feature selection (using reproducibility, variance and pairwise correlation analyses, and a correlation-based subset evaluator), and tuning of a support vector machine (SVM) algorithm, with stratified 10-fold cross-validation. The model was tested on the two remaining institutions' data and compared with a baseline reference and expert radiologist assessment of EPE.

resultsIn total, 193 patients were included. From an initial dataset of 2436 features, 2287 were excluded due to either poor stability, low variance, or high collinearity. Among the remaining, 14 features were used to train the ML model, which reached an overall accuracy of 83% in the training set. In the two external test sets, the SVM achieved an accuracy of 79% and 74% respectively, not statistically different from that of the radiologist (81-83%, p = 0.39-1) and outperforming the baseline reference (p = 0.001-0.02).

conclusionsA ML model solely based on radiomics features demonstrated high accuracy for EPE detection and good generalizability in a multicenter setting. Paired to qualitative EPE assessment, this approach could aid radiologists in this challenging task. KEY POINTS: • Predicting the presence of EPE in prostate cancer patients is a challenging task for radiologists. • A support vector machine algorithm achieved high diagnostic accuracy for EPE detection, with good generalizability when tested on multiple external datasets. • The performance of the algorithm was not significantly different from that of an experienced radiologist.

Indexed as

ProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsHumansMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesMachine learningMagnetic resonance imagingProstate cancerProstatectomySupport vector machine

Identifiers

PMID33792737
PMCPMC8452573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.