Trial reportJAMA network open2021
Comparison of 4-Factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate With Frozen Plasma for Management of Hemorrhage During and After Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Pilot Trial.
Trial report in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04114643 (Prothrombin Complex Concentrate Versus Frozen Plasma in Bleeding Adult Cardiac Surgical Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prothrombin Complex Concentrate Versus Frozen Plasma in Bleeding Adult Cardiac Surgical Patients: A Multicentre, Randomized, Active-control, Pragmatic, Phase 2 Pilot Study
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effect of perioperative erythropoietin-stimulating agents and intravenous iron on patient outcomes following solid organ transplantation: A systematic review.Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England) · 2026Pooled it
- Use of prothrombin complex concentrates in liver transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.British journal of anaesthesia · 2025Pooled it
- Hemostasis Using Prothrombin Complex Concentrate in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Prothrombin complex concentrate in cardiac surgery for the treatment of coagulopathic bleeding.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Trial
- Trial
- Article
- Mathematical modeling of flow-mediated thrombin generation after treatment of postoperative bleeding in cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH · 2026Article
- Prothrombin Complex Concentrate versus Frozen Plasma in Adult Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of chest surgery · 2026Article
- Blood Conservation Protocol for Patients Undergoing Left Ventricular Assisted Device Implantation.Annals of cardiac anaesthesia · 2026Article
- Efficacy and safety of prothrombin complex concentrate versus frozen plasma in cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.British journal of anaesthesia · 2025Article
- Review
- ERAS including minimal Narcotic Pain Management Is Successful After Heart Transplant and LVAD Implantation: A Single Center Review.JHLT open · 2025Article
- Prothrombin Complex Concentrate Versus Fresh Frozen Plasma in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology · 2025Article
- Article
- Delayed cold-stored vs. room temperature stored platelet transfusions in bleeding adult cardiac surgery patients-a randomized multicentre pilot study (PLTS-1).Pilot and feasibility studies · 2024Article
- Dried Plasma for Major Trauma: Past, Present, and Future.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Implementation of a Bleeding Management Algorithm in Liver Transplantation: A Pilot Study.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2024Article
- Prothrombin Complex Concentrate versus Fresh Frozen Plasma in Adult Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of chest surgery · 2024Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Approximately 15% of patients undergoing cardiac surgery receive frozen plasma (FP) for bleeding. Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs) have logistical and safety advantages over FP and may be a suitable alternative. Objectives: To determine the proportion of patients who received PCC and then required FP, explore hemostatic effects and safety, and assess the feasibility of study procedures. Design, Setting, and Participants: Parallel-group randomized pilot study conducted at 2 Canadian hospitals. Adult patients requiring coagulation factor replacement for bleeding during cardiac surgery (from September 23, 2019, to June 19, 2020; final 28-day follow-up visit, July 17, 2020). Data analysis was initiated on September 15, 2020. Interventions: Prothrombin complex concentrate (1500 IU for patients weighing ≤60 kg and 2000 IU for patients weighing >60 kg) or FP (3 U for patients weighing ≤60 kg and 4 U for patients weighing >60 kg), repeated once as needed within 24 hours (FP used for any subsequent doses in both groups). Patients and outcome assessors were blinded to treatment allocation. Main Outcomes and Measures: Hemostatic effectiveness (whether patients received any hemostatic therapies from 60 minutes to 4 and 24 hours after initiation of the intervention, amount of allogeneic blood components administered within 24 hours after start of surgery, and avoidance of red cell transfusions within 24 hours after start of surgery), protocol adherence, and adverse events. The analysis set comprised all randomized patients who had undergone cardiac surgery, received at least 1 dose of either treatment, and provided informed consent after surgery. Results: Of 169 screened patients, 131 were randomized, and 101 were treated (54 with PCC and 47 with FP), provided consent, and were included in the analysis (median age, 64 years; interquartile range [IQR], 54-73 years; 28 [28%] were female; 82 [81%] underwent complex operations). The PCC group received a median 24.9 IU/kg (IQR, 21.8-27.0 IU/kg) of PCC (2 patients [3.7%; 95% CI, 0.4%-12.7%] required FP). The FP group received a median 12.5 mL/kg (IQR, 10.0-15.0 mL/kg) of FP (4 patients [8.5%; 95% CI, 2.4%-20.4%] required >2 doses of FP). Hemostatic therapy was not required at the 4-hour time point for 43 patients (80%) in the PCC group and for 32 patients (68%) in the FP group (P = .25) nor at the 24-hour time point for 41 patients (76%) in the PCC group and for 31 patients (66%) patients in the FP group (P = .28). The median numbers of units for 24-hour cumulative allogeneic transfusions (red blood cells, platelets, and FP) were 6.0 U (IQR, 4.0-11.0 U) in the PCC group and 14.0 U (IQR, 8.0-20.0 U) in the FP group (ratio, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.45-0.77; P < .001). After exclusion of FP administered as part of the investigational medicinal product, the median numbers of units were 6.0 U (IQR, 4.0-11.0 U) in the PCC group and 10.0 U (IQR, 6.0-16.0 U) in the FP group (ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.59-1.08; P = .15). For red blood cells alone, the median numbers were 1.5 U (IQR, 0.0-4.0 U) in the PCC group and 3.0 U (IQR, 1.0-5.0 U) in the FP group (ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.47-0.99; P = .05). During the first 24 hours after start of surgery, 15 patients in the PCC group (28%) and 8 patients in the FP group (17%) received no red blood cells (P = .24). Adverse event profiles were similar. Conclusions and Relevance: This randomized clinical trial found that the study protocols were feasible. Adequately powered randomized clinical trials are warranted to determine whether PCC is a suitable substitute for FP for mitigation of bleeding in cardiac surgery. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04114643.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.