Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33792724›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2021

Multimodal, multitask, multiattention (M3) deep learning detection of reticular pseudodrusen: Toward automated and accessible classification of age-related macular degeneration.

Qingyu Chen, Tiarnan D L Keenan, Alexis Allot, Yifan Peng, Elvira Agrón, Amitha Domalpally, Caroline C W Klaver, Daniel T Luttikhuizen, Marcus H Colyer, Catherine A Cukras and 8 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Multimodality Fusion Strategies in Eye Disease Diagnosis.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Qingyu ChenNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6036-1516
Tiarnan D L KeenanDivision of Epidemiology and Clinical Applications, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Alexis AllotNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Yifan PengNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9309-8331
Elvira AgrónDivision of Epidemiology and Clinical Applications, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Amitha DomalpallyFundus Photograph Reading Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Caroline C W KlaverDepartment of Ophthalmology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Daniel T LuttikhuizenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Marcus H ColyerDepartment of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Catherine A CukrasDivision of Epidemiology and Clinical Applications, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Henry E WileyDivision of Epidemiology and Clinical Applications, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
M Teresa MagoneDivision of Epidemiology and Clinical Applications, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Chantal Cousineau-KriegerDivision of Epidemiology and Clinical Applications, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Wai T WongDivision of Epidemiology and Clinical Applications, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Yingying ZhuDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas, USA.
Emily Y ChewDivision of Epidemiology and Clinical Applications, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Zhiyong LuNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
AREDS2 Deep Learning Research Group
National Institutes of Health · USErasmus MC · NLThe University of Texas at Arlington · USUniformed Services University of the Health Sciences · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Named Entity Recognition and Relationship Extraction in BiomedicineZIALM091813 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI LU, ZHIYONG · 2013 to 2022
$13.4M
A framework to enhance radiology structured report by invoking NLP and DL: Models and ApplicationsR00LM013001 · NLM · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI PENG, YIFAN · 2020 to 2022
$710k
Age-Related Eye Disease Follow-up Study (AREDS) Follow-up StudyZIAEY000489 · NEI · NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE · PI CHEW, EMILY Y · 2009 to 2025
$639k
NLM NIH HHS R00 LM013001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveReticular pseudodrusen (RPD), a key feature of age-related macular degeneration (AMD), are poorly detected by human experts on standard color fundus photography (CFP) and typically require advanced imaging modalities such as fundus autofluorescence (FAF). The objective was to develop and evaluate the performance of a novel multimodal, multitask, multiattention (M3) deep learning framework on RPD detection. MATERIALS AND

methodsA deep learning framework (M3) was developed to detect RPD presence accurately using CFP alone, FAF alone, or both, employing >8000 CFP-FAF image pairs obtained prospectively (Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2). The M3 framework includes multimodal (detection from single or multiple image modalities), multitask (training different tasks simultaneously to improve generalizability), and multiattention (improving ensembled feature representation) operation. Performance on RPD detection was compared with state-of-the-art deep learning models and 13 ophthalmologists; performance on detection of 2 other AMD features (geographic atrophy and pigmentary abnormalities) was also evaluated.

resultsFor RPD detection, M3 achieved an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.832, 0.931, and 0.933 for CFP alone, FAF alone, and both, respectively. M3 performance on CFP was very substantially superior to human retinal specialists (median F1 score = 0.644 vs 0.350). External validation (the Rotterdam Study) demonstrated high accuracy on CFP alone (AUROC, 0.965). The M3 framework also accurately detected geographic atrophy and pigmentary abnormalities (AUROC, 0.909 and 0.912, respectively), demonstrating its generalizability.

conclusionsThis study demonstrates the successful development, robust evaluation, and external validation of a novel deep learning framework that enables accessible, accurate, and automated AMD diagnosis and prognosis.

Indexed as

Deep LearningDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedAgedComputer SimulationDatasets as TopicFemaleFundus OculiHumansMacular DegenerationMaleRetinal DrusenAge-Related Eye Disease Study 2age-related macular degenerationdeep learningmultiattention deep learningmultimodal deep learningmultitask trainingreticular pseudodrusensubretinal drusenoid deposits

Identifiers

PMID33792724
PMCPMC8200273
OpenAlexW3150641585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.