Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33792682›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2021

Being the Gatekeeper: How Thinking about Sharing Affects Neural Encoding of Information.

Hang-Yee Chan, Christin Scholz, Elisa C Baek, Matthew B O'Donnell, Emily B Falk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hang-Yee ChanAmsterdam School of Communication Research, University of Amsterdam, 1018 WV Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7179-9436
Christin ScholzAmsterdam School of Communication Research, University of Amsterdam, 1018 WV Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6567-7504
Elisa C BaekDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2834-1766
Matthew B O'DonnellAnnenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Emily B FalkAnnenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6383-1846

Funding

Can neuroscience dramatically improve our ability to design health communicationsDP2DA035156 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI FALK, EMILY · 2012 to 2012
$2.3M
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency D14AP00048NIDA NIH HHS DP2 DA035156NIH HHS 1DP2DA03515601US Army Research Laboratory W911NF-10-2-0022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Information transmission in a society depends on individuals' intention to share or not. Yet, little is known about whether being the gatekeeper shapes the brain's processing of incoming information. Here, we examine how thinking about sharing affects neural encoding of information, and whether this effect is moderated by the person's real-life social network position. In an functional magnetic resonance imaging study, participants rated abstracts of news articles on how much they wanted to read for themselves (read) or-as information gatekeepers-to share with a specific other (narrowcast) or to post on their social media feed (broadcast). In all conditions, consistent spatial blood oxygen level-dependent patterns associated with news articles were observed across participants in brain regions involved in perceptual and language processing as well as higher-order processes. However, when thinking about sharing, encoding consistency decreased in higher-order processing areas (e.g., default mode network), suggesting that the gatekeeper role involves more individualized processing in the brain, that is, person- and context-specific. Moreover, participants whose social networks had high ego-betweenness centrality (i.e., more likely to be information gatekeeper in real life) showed more individualized encoding when thinking about broadcasting. This study reveals how gatekeeping shapes our brain's processing of incoming information.

Indexed as

Social BehaviorBrainDefault Mode NetworkEgoFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMental ProcessesThinkingYoung Adultinformation sharingneural consistencysocial network analysis

Identifiers

PMID33792682
PMCPMC8258440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.