Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33792485›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of primary health care2021

Phone triage nurses' assessment of respiratory tract infections - the tightrope walk between gatekeeping and service providing. A qualitative study.

Bent Håkan Lindberg, Ingrid Keilegavlen Rebnord, Sigurd Høye

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bent Håkan LindbergAntibiotic Centre for Primary Care, Department of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Ingrid Keilegavlen RebnordNational Centre for Emergency Primary Health Care, NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Bergen, Norway.
Sigurd HøyeAntibiotic Centre for Primary Care, Department of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
University of Oslo · NOUniversity of Bergen · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhone nurses triage callers to Norwegian out-of-hours cooperatives to estimate the appropriate urgency and level of care for the caller. Many callers with mild symptoms of respiratory tract infections receive a doctor's consultation, which may lead to busy sessions and in turn impair clinical decisions.

objectiveThis study explores how phone triage nurses assess callers with mild-to-moderate symptoms of respiratory tract infections and their views and experiences on triaging and counselling these callers.

methodsWe conducted four focus groups with 22 nurses (five men and 17 women aged 24-66 years) in three different locations in Norway. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed by systematic text condensation.

resultsThe informants were reluctant to call themselves gatekeepers. However, their description of their work indicates that they practice such a role. When nurses and callers disagreed about the right level of care, the informants sought consensus through strategies and negotiations. The informants described external factors such as organisational or financial issues as decisive for the population's use of out-of-hours services. They also described callers' characteristics, such as language deficiency and poor ability to describe symptoms, as determining their own clinical assessments.

conclusionsNurses perceive assessments of callers with respiratory tract infections as challenging. They need skills and time to reach a consensus with the callers and guide them to the right level of health care. This should be considered when planning nurse training and staffing of out-of-hours cooperatives.KEY-POINTSPhone triage nurses assess callers to the out-of-hours service and estimate the level of urgencyThis study explores how phone triage nurses assess callers with respiratory tract infections and their views and experiences on this taskThe nurses describe their professional role as a tightrope walk between gatekeeping and service providingThe nurses seek consensus with callers through strategies and negotiations.

Indexed as

NursesRespiratory Tract InfectionsFemaleGatekeepingHumansMaleTelephoneTriagenurses’ roleOut-of-hoursphone triageprimary health carequalitative researchrespiratory tract infections

Identifiers

PMID33792485
PMCPMC8293966
OpenAlexW3148749576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.