ArticleACS biomaterials science & engineering2021
In Vivo Evaluation of the Regenerative Capability of Glycylglycine Ethyl Ester-Substituted Polyphosphazene and Poly(lactic-
Article in ACS biomaterials science & engineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bioinspired hydrogel-based regenerative engineering strategies for the structural and functional regeneration of skeletal muscles following volumetric muscle loss.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Review
- Decellularized Extracellular Matrix-Derived Hydrogels: a Powerful Class of Biomaterials for Skeletal Muscle Regenerative Engineering Applications.Regenerative engineering and translational medicine · 2025Article
- Review
- Development of porcine skeletal muscle extracellular matrix-derived hydrogels with improved properties and low immunogenicity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Polyphosphazene-Based Biomaterials for Biomedical Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Cyclo- and Polyphosphazenes for Biomedical Applications.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Biodegradable Polyphosphazenes for Regenerative Engineering.Journal of materials research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In an effort to understand the biological capability of polyphosphazene-based polymers, three-dimensional biomimetic bone scaffolds were fabricated using the blends of poly[(glycine ethylglycinato)
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.