Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33792207›Full record

ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2021

Identification of high-dimensional omics-derived predictors for tumor growth dynamics using machine learning and pharmacometric modeling.

Laura B Zwep, Kevin L W Duisters, Martijn Jansen, Tingjie Guo, Jacqueline J Meulman, Parth J Upadhyay, J G Coen van Hasselt

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Laura B ZwepLeiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Kevin L W DuistersMathematical Institute, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Martijn JansenLeiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Tingjie GuoLeiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Jacqueline J MeulmanMathematical Institute, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Parth J UpadhyayLeiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
J G Coen van HasseltLeiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Centre for Human Drug Research · NLLeiden University · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pharmacometric modeling can capture tumor growth inhibition (TGI) dynamics and variability. These approaches do not usually consider covariates in high-dimensional settings, whereas high-dimensional molecular profiling technologies ("omics") are being increasingly considered for prediction of anticancer drug treatment response. Machine learning (ML) approaches have been applied to identify high-dimensional omics predictors for treatment outcome. Here, we aimed to combine TGI modeling and ML approaches for two distinct aims: omics-based prediction of tumor growth profiles and identification of pathways associated with treatment response and resistance. We propose a two-step approach combining ML using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression with pharmacometric modeling. We demonstrate our workflow using a previously published dataset consisting of 4706 tumor growth profiles of patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models treated with a variety of mono- and combination regimens. Pharmacometric TGI models were fit to the tumor growth profiles. The obtained empirical Bayes estimates-derived TGI parameter values were regressed using the LASSO on high-dimensional genomic copy number variation data, which contained over 20,000 variables. The predictive model was able to decrease median prediction error by 4% as compared with a model without any genomic information. A total of 74 pathways were identified as related to treatment response or resistance development by LASSO, of which part was verified by literature. In conclusion, we demonstrate how the combined use of ML and pharmacometric modeling can be used to gain pharmacological understanding in genomic factors driving variation in treatment response.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsBayes TheoremBiological Variation, PopulationDNA Copy Number VariationsDrug DevelopmentDrug DiscoveryGenomicsHumansMachine LearningMiceModels, AnimalNeoplasmsPharmacogeneticsPredictive Value of TestsTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID33792207
PMCPMC8099445
OpenAlexW3141053945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.