Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33792060›Full record

ReviewSociology of health & illness2021

Interrogating the promise of technology in epilepsy care: systematic, hermeneutic review.

Chrysanthi Papoutsi, Christian D E Collins, Alexandra Christopher, Sara E Shaw, Trisha Greenhalgh

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sociology of health & illness, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Rural perinatal nursing in Canada: A hermeneutic literature review.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chrysanthi PapoutsiNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1189-7100
Christian D E CollinsNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Alexandra ChristopherNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Sara E ShawNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Trisha GreenhalghNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
University of Oxford · GBHorton General Hospital · GB

Funding

Department of Health BRC-1215-20008Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT104830MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Technology development is gathering pace in epilepsy with seizure detection devices promising to transform self-care and service provision. However, such accounts often neglect the uncertainties, displacements and responsibilities that technology-supported care generates. This review brings together a heterogeneous literature, identified through systematic searches in 8 databases and snowball searching, to interrogate how technology becomes positioned in epilepsy care. We took a hermeneutic approach in our analysis of the 206 included articles, which resulted in the development of a conceptual framework surfacing the underlying logics by which technology-supported epilepsy care is organised. Each of these logics enacts different techno-scientific futures and carries specific assumptions about how (often imagined) 'users' and their bodies become co-constituted. Our review shows that studies in this area remain primarily deterministic and technology-focused. Few draw phenomenological insights on lived experiences with epilepsy or use social theory to problematise the role of technology. We propose future directions for sociotechnical, theory-driven studies of technology in epilepsy care and offer a framework transferable across other long-term conditions.

Indexed as

EpilepsyTechnologyHermeneuticsHumansSelf Caree-healthepilepsyhermeneutic reviewsociotechnical theoryuser representations

Identifiers

PMID33792060
PMCPMC8317050
OpenAlexW3147125000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.