Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33792051›Full record

SynthesisClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2021

Prognostic Factors and Treatment-Effect Modifiers in Spinal Muscular Atrophy.

Giovanni Baranello, Ksenija Gorni, Monica Daigl, Anna Kotzeva, Rachel Evans, Neil Hawkins, David A Scott, Anadi Mahajan, Francesco Muntoni, Laurent Servais

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The impact of threeFrontiers in neurology · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. In Search of Spinal Muscular Atrophy Disease Modifiers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Giovanni BaranelloDubowitz Neuromuscular Centre, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.
Ksenija GorniF. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.
Monica DaiglF. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.
Anna KotzevaF. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.
Rachel EvansVisible Analytics, Oxford, UK.
Neil HawkinsBridge Medical Consulting Ltd, London, UK.
David A ScottVisible Analytics, Oxford, UK.
Anadi MahajanBridge Medical Consulting Ltd, London, UK.
Francesco MuntoniDubowitz Neuromuscular Centre, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.
Laurent ServaisDivision of Child Neurology Reference Center for Neuromuscular Disease, Department of Pediatrics, Centre Hospitalier Régional de Références des Maladies Neuromusculaires, University Hospital Liège & University of La Citadelle, Liège, Belgium.
Roche (Switzerland) · CHCentre hospitalier régional de la Citadelle · BENational Health Service · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a rare, progressive neuromuscular disease characterized by loss of motor neurons and muscle atrophy. Untreated infants with type 1 SMA do not achieve major motor milestones, and death from respiratory failure typically occurs before 2 years of age. Individuals with types 2 and 3 SMA exhibit milder phenotypes and have better functional and survival outcomes. Herein, a systematic literature review was conducted to identify factors that influence the prognosis of types 1, 2, and 3 SMA. In untreated infants with type 1 SMA, absence of symptoms at birth, a later symptom onset, and a higher survival of motor neuron 2 (SMN2) copy number are all associated with increased survival. Disease duration, age at treatment initiation, and, to a lesser extent, baseline function were identified as potential treatment-modifying factors for survival, emphasizing that early treatment with disease-modifying therapies (DMT) is essential in type 1 SMA. In patients with types 2 and 3 SMA, factors considered prognostic of changes in motor function were SMN2 copy number, age, and ambulatory status. Individuals aged 6-15 years were particularly vulnerable to developing complications (scoliosis and progressive joint contractures) which negatively influence functional outcomes and may also affect the therapeutic response in patients. Age at the time of treatment initiation emerged as a treatment-effect modifier on the outcome of DMTs. Factors identified in this review should be considered prior to designing or analyzing studies in an SMA population, conducting population matching, or summarizing results from different studies on the treatments for SMA.

Indexed as

CholestenonesHumansMuscular Atrophy, SpinalObservational Studies as TopicOligonucleotidesPrognosisRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeCholestenonesnusinersenolesoximeOligonucleotides

Identifiers

PMID33792051
PMCPMC9292571
OpenAlexW3140066921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.