Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33792046›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of botany2021

Effects of ambient climate and three warming treatments on fruit production in an alpine, subarctic meadow community.

Juha M Alatalo, Annika K Jägerbrand, Junhu Dai, Mohammad D Mollazehi, Abdel-Salam G Abdel-Salam, Rajiv Pandey, Ulf Molau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of botany, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Maize Intercropping in the Traditional "Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Juha M AlataloDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences, College of Arts and Sciences, Qatar University, P.O. Box 2713, Doha, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0001-5084-850X
Annika K JägerbrandCalluna AB, Hästholmsvägen 28, 131 30, Nacka, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-5322-9827
Junhu DaiKey Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6401-1735
Mohammad D MollazehiDepartment of Mathematics, Statistics, and Physics, College of Arts and Sciences, Qatar University, P.O. Box 2713, Doha, Qatar.
Abdel-Salam G Abdel-SalamDepartment of Mathematics, Statistics, and Physics, College of Arts and Sciences, Qatar University, P.O. Box 2713, Doha, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0003-4905-6489
Rajiv PandeyDivision of Forestry Statistics, Indian Council of Forestry Research and Education, Dehradun, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4849-775X
Ulf MolauDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, P.O. Box 461, SE-405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-6089-6879

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

premiseClimate change is having major impacts on alpine and arctic regions, and inter-annual variations in temperature are likely to increase. How increased climate variability will impact plant reproduction is unclear.

methodsIn a 4-year study on fruit production by an alpine plant community in northern Sweden, we applied three warming regimes: (1) a static level of warming with open-top chambers (OTC), (2) press warming, a yearly stepwise increase in warming, and (3) pulse warming, a single-year pulse event of higher warming. We analyzed the relationship between fruit production and monthly temperatures during the budding period, fruiting period, and whole fruit production period and the effect of winter and summer precipitation on fruit production.

resultsYear and treatment had a significant effect on total fruit production by evergreen shrubs, Cassiope tetragona, and Dryas octopetala, with large variations between treatments and years. Year, but not treatment, had a significant effect on deciduous shrubs and graminoids, both of which increased fruit production over the 4 years, while forbs were negatively affected by the press warming, but not by year. Fruit production was influenced by ambient temperature during the previous-year budding period, current-year fruiting period, and whole fruit production period. Minimum and average temperatures were more important than maximum temperature. In general, fruit production was negatively correlated with increased precipitation.

conclusionsThese results indicate that predicted increased climate variability and increased precipitation due to climate change may affect plant reproductive output and long-term community dynamics in alpine meadow communities.

Indexed as

FruitGrasslandArctic RegionsClimate ChangeSwedenTemperatureclimatic eventsexperimental warmingglobal warmingplant reproductionplant reproductive successpolar regionrain falltundra

Identifiers

PMID33792046
PMCPMC8251864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.