Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33791995›Full record

ReviewReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2021

Current and Future Perspectives for Improving Ovarian Tissue Cryopreservation and Transplantation Outcomes for Cancer Patients.

Sanghoon Lee, Sinan Ozkavukcu, Seung-Yup Ku

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. JBRA assisted reproduction · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. The report of ovarian tissue transplant in Iran: A case report.International journal of reproductive biomedicine · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Sanghoon LeeMoores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA. mdleesh@gmil.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5546-0763
Sinan OzkavukcuCenter for Assisted Reproduction, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Seung-Yup KuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ankara University · TRSeoul National University · KRUniversity of San Diego · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although advances in cancer treatment and early diagnosis have significantly improved cancer survival rates, cancer therapies can cause serious side effects, including ovarian failure and infertility, in women of reproductive age. Infertility following cancer treatment can have significant adverse effects on the quality of life. However, established methods for fertility preservation, including embryo or oocyte cryopreservation, are not always suitable for female cancer patients because of complicated individual conditions and treatment methods. Ovarian tissue cryopreservation and transplantation is a promising option for fertility preservation in pre-pubertal girls and adult patients with cancer who require immediate treatment, or who are not eligible to undergo ovarian stimulation. This review introduces various methods and strategies to improve ovarian tissue cryopreservation and transplantation outcomes, to help patients and clinicians choose the best option when considering the potential complexity of a patient's situation. Effective multidisciplinary oncofertility strategies, involving the inclusion of a highly skilled and experienced oncofertility team that considers cryopreservation methods, thawing processes and devices, surgical procedures for transplantation, and advances in technologies, are necessary to provide high-quality care to a cancer patient.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAntineoplastic AgentsCryopreservationFemaleFertility PreservationGraft SurvivalHumansInfertility, FemaleIn Vitro Oocyte Maturation TechniquesNeoplasmsOvaryRadiotherapyStem CellsTransplantation, AutologousYoung AdultAntineoplastic AgentsAutologous transplantationCancer treatmentFertility preservationOncofertilityOvarian freezingPrimary ovarian insufficiency

Identifiers

PMID33791995
PMCPMC8144135
OpenAlexW3141659244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.