Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33791921›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2021

A machine learning-based pulmonary venous obstruction prediction model using clinical data and CT image.

Zeyang Yao, Xinrong Hu, Xiaobing Liu, Wen Xie, Yuhao Dong, Hailong Qiu, Zewen Chen, Yiyu Shi, Xiaowei Xu, Meiping Huang and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Zeyang Yao *School of Medicine, South China University of Technology Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of South China Structural Heart Disease, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Dongchuan Rd 96, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Xinrong Hu *Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of South China Structural Heart Disease, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Dongchuan Rd 96, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Xiaobing Liu *Department of Cardiac Surgery, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of South China Structural Heart Disease, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Dongchuan Rd 96, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Wen XieSchool of Medicine, South China University of Technology Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of South China Structural Heart Disease, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Dongchuan Rd 96, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Yuhao DongDepartment of Catheterization Lab, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of South China Structural Heart Disease, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Dongchuan Rd 96, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Hailong QiuDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of South China Structural Heart Disease, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Dongchuan Rd 96, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Zewen ChenDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of South China Structural Heart Disease, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Dongchuan Rd 96, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Yiyu ShiGuangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of South China Structural Heart Disease, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Dongchuan Rd 96, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Xiaowei XuGuangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of South China Structural Heart Disease, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Dongchuan Rd 96, Guangzhou, 510080, China. xiao.wei.xu@foxmail.com.
Meiping HuangDepartment of Catheterization Lab, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of South China Structural Heart Disease, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Dongchuan Rd 96, Guangzhou, 510080, China. huangmeiping@126.com.
Jian ZhuangDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of South China Structural Heart Disease, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Dongchuan Rd 96, Guangzhou, 510080, China. zhuangjian5413@163.com.

Funding

Guangdong Peak Project DFJH201802National Key Research and Development Program of China 2018YFC1002600the Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province 2017B030314109the Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province 2017B090904034the Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province 2018B090944002the Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province 2019B020230003the Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province No. 2017A070701013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn this study, we try to consider the most common type of total anomalous pulmonary venous connection and established a machine learning-based prediction model for postoperative pulmonary venous obstruction by using clinical data and CT images jointly.

methodPatients diagnosed with supracardiac TPAVC from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2018, in Guangdong Province People's Hospital were enrolled. Logistic regression were applied for clinical data features selection, while a convolutional neural network was used to extract CT images features. The prediction model was established by integrating the above two kinds of features for PVO prediction. And the proposed methods were evaluated using fourfold cross-validation.

resultFinally, 131 patients were enrolled in our study. Results show that compared with traditional approaches, the machine learning-based joint method using clinical data and CT image achieved the highest average AUC score of 0.943. In addition, the joint method also achieved a higher sensitivity of 0.828 and a higher positive prediction value of 0.864.

conclusionUsing clinical data and CT images jointly can improve the performance significantly compared with other methods that using only clinical data or CT images. The proposed machine learning-based joint method demonstrates the practicability of fully using multi-modality clinical data.

Indexed as

Machine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerArea Under CurveHumansLogistic ModelsLungPredictive Value of TestsPulmonary VeinsROC CurveTomography, X-Ray ComputedVascular DiseasesDeep learningPredictionPulmonary venous obstructionTotal anomalous pulmonary venous connection

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.