Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33791910›Full record

ArticleJournal of digital imaging2021

The Effects of Perinodular Features on Solid Lung Nodule Classification.

José Lucas Leite Calheiros, Lucas Benevides Viana de Amorim, Lucas Lins de Lima, Ailton Felix de Lima Filho, José Raniery Ferreira Júnior, Marcelo Costa de Oliveira

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Lung Nodule Segmentation and Recognition Algorithm Based on Multiposition U-Net.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

José Lucas Leite CalheirosComputing Institute, Federal University of Alagoas (UFAL), Maceió, AL, Brazil. lucaslc@uc.ufal.br.ORCID 0000-0002-8720-8108
Lucas Benevides Viana de AmorimComputing Institute, Federal University of Alagoas (UFAL), Maceió, AL, Brazil.
Lucas Lins de LimaComputing Institute, Federal University of Alagoas (UFAL), Maceió, AL, Brazil.
Ailton Felix de Lima FilhoComputing Institute, Federal University of Alagoas (UFAL), Maceió, AL, Brazil.
José Raniery Ferreira JúniorRibeirão Preto Medical School, University of Sao Paulo (USP), Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Marcelo Costa de OliveiraComputing Institute, Federal University of Alagoas (UFAL), Maceió, AL, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Alagoas · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung cancer is the most lethal malignant neoplasm worldwide, with an annual estimated rate of 1.8 million deaths. Computed tomography has been widely used to diagnose and detect lung cancer, but its diagnosis remains an intricate and challenging work, even for experienced radiologists. Computer-aided diagnosis tools and radiomics tools have provided support to the radiologist's decision, acting as a second opinion. The main focus of these tools has been to analyze the intranodular zone; nevertheless, recent works indicate that the interaction between the nodule and its surroundings (perinodular zone) could be relevant to the diagnosis process. However, only a few works have investigated the importance of specific attributes of the perinodular zone and have shown how important they are in the classification of lung nodules. In this context, the purpose of this work is to evaluate the impact of using the perinodular zone on the characterization of lung lesions. Motivated by reproducible research, we used a large public dataset of solid lung nodule images and extracted fine-tuned radiomic attributes from the perinodular and intranodular zones. Our best-evaluated model obtained an average AUC of 0.916, an accuracy of 84.26%, a sensitivity of 84.45%, and specificity of 83.84%. The combination of attributes from the perinodular and intranodular zones in the image characterization resulted in an improvement in all the metrics analyzed when compared to intranodular-only characterization. Therefore, our results highlighted the importance of using the perinodular zone in the solid pulmonary nodules classification process.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsSolitary Pulmonary NoduleDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedHumansLungRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedRadiologistsTomography, X-Ray ComputedCADxComputed tomographyLung nodule classificationMachine learningPerinodular zoneRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID33791910
PMCPMC8455787
OpenAlexW3146097188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.