Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33791900›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2021

Will It Play in Peoria? A Pilot Study of a Robotic Skills Curriculum for Surgical Oncology Fellows.

Sarwat B Ahmad, MaryJoe Rice, Cecilia Chang, Ahmad Hamad, T Peter Kingham, Jin He, Jose M Pimiento, Amer H Zureikat, Herbert J Zeh, Melissa E Hogg

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Initiation of a robotic pancreatoduodenectomy program using virtual collaboration.HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Sarwat B AhmadUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. sarwatbahmad@gmail.com.
MaryJoe RiceUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Cecilia ChangNorth Shore University Health System, Chicago, IL, USA.
Ahmad HamadThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
T Peter KinghamMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Jin HeJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Jose M PimientoMoffit Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
Amer H ZureikatUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Herbert J ZehUniversity of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA.
Melissa E HoggNorth Shore University Health System, Chicago, IL, USA.
NorthShore University HealthSystem · USUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USMoffitt Cancer Center · USThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Intuitive Surgical EIN 23-0965480NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTo implement a mastery-based robotic surgery curriculum using virtual reality (VR) and inanimate reality (IR) drills at multiple Complex General Surgical Oncology (CGSO) fellowships. PATIENTS AND

methodsA prospective study of curriculum feasibility and efficacy was conducted at four CGSO fellowship sites. All sites had simulators, and kits were provided to perform 19 biotissue drills. Fellows from three non-UPMC sites (n = 15) in 2016-2018 were compared with fellows from University of Pittsburgh (UPMC; n = 15) where the curriculum was validated in 2014-2018.

resultsAll fellows completed the pre- and post-test. There was no difference in pre-test scores between UPMC and non-UPMC sites. Only 7 of 15 non-UPMC fellows completed the VR curriculum (47% compliance) compared with all 15 UPMC fellows completing the VR curriculum (100% compliance). UPMC had higher curriculum times (217 versus 93 mins) and % mastery (86% versus 55%). Time spent on curriculum was associated with % mastery (p = 0.01). Both groups showed improvement between pre- and post-test. Post-test VR scores trended higher for UPMC (221 versus 180). Between the non-UPMC sites, there was a difference in compliance (p = 0.03) and % mastery (p = 0.03). Zero non-UPMC fellows performed the biotissue drills, while five contemporary UPMC fellows completed 253 biotissue drills. Approximately 140 UPMC faculty and 300 staff hours were spent on the pilot.

conclusionsA proficiency curriculum can result in improved robotic console skills. However, multiple barriers to implementation potentially exist, including availability of simulators, availability of a training robot, on-site support staff, and universal buy-in from fellows, faculty, and leadership.

Indexed as

RoboticsRobotic Surgical ProceduresSurgical OncologyClinical CompetenceCurriculumHumansPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesRobotic surgerySurgical simulationVirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID33791900
PMCPMC9376788
OpenAlexW3142307774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.