Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33791890›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2021

The future of meniscus science: international expert consensus.

Nicholas N DePhillipo, Robert F LaPrade, Stefano Zaffagnini, Caroline Mouton, Romain Seil, Philippe Beaufils

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Clinical Outcome of Arthroscopic Repair for Isolated Meniscus Tear in Athletes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Meniscectomy is still a frequent orthopedic procedure: a pending need for education on the meniscus treatment possibilities.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Nicholas N DePhillipoOslo Sports Trauma Research Center, 4014 Ulleval Stadion, 0806, Oslo, Norway. Nickd.atc@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8946-4028
Robert F LaPradeTwin Cities Orthopedics, Edina, MN, USA.
Stefano ZaffagniniRizzoli Orthopedic Institutes of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Caroline MoutonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg, Clinique d'Eich, Luxembourg city, Luxembourg.
Romain SeilDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg, Clinique d'Eich, Luxembourg city, Luxembourg.
Philippe BeaufilsCentre Hospitalier de Versailles, Versailles, France.
Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg · LUCentre Hospitalier de Versailles · FRIstituto Ortopedico Rizzoli · ITOslo Sports Trauma Research Center · NOTwin Cities Orthopedics · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the main focus areas for research and development for furthering the state of meniscus science in 2021.

methodsAn electronic survey including 10 questions was sent in a blind fashion to the faculty members of the 5

resultsOf the 82 faculty, 76 (93%) from 18 different countries completed the survey (84% male, 16% female). The highest ranked future research and development focus areas were meniscus repair, biologics, osteotomy procedures, addressing meniscus extrusion, and the development of new therapies for the prevention of posttraumatic osteoarthritis. Currently, the most 'valuable' type of biologic reported for meniscus treatment was platelet-rich plasma. The main reported global research limitation was a lack of long-term clinical outcomes data. The most promising emerging medical technologies for improving meniscus science were 3-D printing, personalized medicine, and artificial implants.

conclusionsThis survey suggests that the future of meniscus science should be focused on meniscal preservation techniques through meniscus repair, addressing meniscal extrusion, and the use of orthobiologics. The lack of long-term clinical outcomes was the main reported research limitation globally for meniscus treatment. Future product development utilizing emerging medical technologies suggest the use of 3-D printing for meniscal transplants/scaffolds, personalized treatment, and bioengineering for artificial implants. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V.

Indexed as

BiomechanicsKnee osteotomyMeniscal extrusionMeniscus repairOrthobiologicsOrthopedic medical devicesPosttraumatic osteoarthritis

Identifiers

PMID33791890
PMCPMC8012449
OpenAlexW3147613817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.