Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33791839›Full record

ReviewPediatric radiology2022

Screening of cancer predisposition syndromes.

Haifa Al-Sarhani, Ravi V Gottumukkala, Angelo Don S Grasparil, Eric L Tung, Michael S Gee, Mary-Louise C Greer

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Genetic predisposition to childhood cancer.World journal of clinical pediatrics · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Hereditary cancer syndromes.World journal of clinical oncology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Haifa Al-SarhaniDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave., Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada.
Ravi V GottumukkalaDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Angelo Don S GrasparilDepartment of Radiological Sciences, Cardinal Santos Medical Center, San Juan City, Philippines.
Eric L TungDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Michael S GeeDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Mary-Louise C GreerDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave., Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada. mary-louise.greer@sickkids.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6159-5472
Harvard University · USUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pediatric patients with cancer predisposition syndromes are at increased risk of developing malignancies compared with their age-matched peers, necessitating regular surveillance. Screening protocols differ among syndromes and are composed of a number of elements, imaging being one. Surveillance can be initiated in infants, children and adolescents with a tumor known or suspected of being related to a cancer predisposition syndrome or where genetic testing identifies a germline pathogenic gene variant in an asymptomatic child. Pre-symptomatic detection of malignant neoplasms offers potential to improve treatment options and survival outcomes, but the benefits and risks of screening need to be weighed, particularly with variable penetrance in many cancer predisposition syndromes. In this review we discuss the benefits and risks of surveillance imaging and the importance of integrating imaging and non-imaging screening elements. We explore the principles of surveillance imaging with particular reference to whole-body MRI, considering the strategies to minimize false-negative and manage false-positive whole-body MRI results, the value of standardized nomenclature when reporting risk stratification to better guide patient management, and the need for timely communication of results to allay anxiety. Cancer predisposition syndrome screening is a multimodality, multidisciplinary and longitudinal process, so developing formalized frameworks for surveillance imaging programs should enhance diagnostic performance while improving the patient experience.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerNeoplasmsAdolescentChildGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansInfantMagnetic Resonance ImagingSyndromeCancer predisposition syndromeChildrenLi–Fraumeni syndromeSubsequent malignant neoplasmsSurveillance imagingWhole-body magnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID33791839
OpenAlexW3139598343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.