Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33791726›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2021

Pre-pandemic Cognitive Function and COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: Cohort Study.

G David Batty, Ian J Deary, Chloe Fawns-Ritchie, Catharine R Gale, Drew Altschul

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

G David BattyDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1822-5753
Ian J DearyLothian Birth Cohorts, Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1733-263X
Chloe Fawns-RitchieDepartment of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7493-2228
Catharine R GaleMedical Research Council Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3361-8638
Drew AltschulDepartment of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7053-4209
NHS Lothian · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Evaluating Longitudinal Changes in the Human Structural Connectome in Relation to Cognitive AgingR01AG054628 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI TUCKER-DROB, ELLIOT MAX · 2017 to 2021
$2.7M
Healthy transitions from mid-life to early older age: biomedical follow-up of 1958 Birth Cohort Study members at age 60R01AG052519 · NIA · UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON · PI BATTY, DAVID, GOODMAN, ALISSA · 2017 to 2021
$1.9M
Healthy transitions from mid-life to early older age: biomedical follow-up of 1958 Birth Cohort Study members at age 60R56AG052519 · NIA · UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON · PI BATTY, DAVID, GOODMAN, ALISSA · 2016 to 2016
$500k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG052519NIA NIH HHS R01 AG054628NIA NIH HHS R56 AG052519
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Whereas several predictors of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy have been examined, the role of cognitive function following the widely publicised development of an inoculation is unknown. Objective: To test the association between scores from an array of cognitive function tests and self-reported vaccine hesitancy after the announcement of the successful testing of the Oxford University/AstraZeneca vaccine. Design Setting and Participants: We used individual-level data from a pandemic-focused study (COVID Survey), a prospective cohort study nested within Understanding Society (Main Survey). In the week immediately following the announcement of successful testing of the first efficacious inoculation (November/December 2020), data on vaccine intentionality were collected in 11740 individuals (6702 women) aged 16-95. Pre-pandemic scores on general cognitive function, ascertained from a battery of six tests, were captured in 2011/12 wave of the Main Survey. Measurements: Self-reported intention to take up a vaccination for COVID-19. To summarise our results, we computed odds ratios with accompanying 95% confidence intervals for general cognitive function adjusted for selected covariates. Results: Of the study sample, 17.2% (N=1842) indicated they were hesitant about having the vaccine. After adjustment for age, sex, and ethnicity, study members with a lower baseline cognition score were markedly more likely to be vaccine hesitant (odds ratio per standard deviation lower score in cognition; 95% confidence interval: 1.76; 1.62, 1.90). Adjustment for mental and physical health plus household shielding status had no impact on these results, whereas controlling for educational attainment led to partial attenuation but the probability of hesitancy was still elevated (1.52; 1.37, 1.67). There was a linear association for vaccine hesitancy across the full range of cognition scores (p for trend: p<0.0001). Limitations: Our outcome was based on intention rather than behaviour. Conclusions: Erroneous social media reports might have complicated personal decision-making, leading to people with lower cognitive ability test scores being vaccine-hesitant. With people with lower cognition also experiencing higher rates of COVID-19 in studies conducted prior to vaccine distribution, these new findings are suggestive of a potential additional disease burden.

Identifiers

PMID33791726
PMCPMC8010758
OpenAlexW3136638925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.