Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33791548›Full record

ArticleIntegrative organismal biology (Oxford, England)2020

A CURE for a Major Challenge in Phenomics: A Practical Guide to Implementing a Quantitative Specimen-Based Undergraduate Research Experience.

S A Price, O Larouche, S T Friedman, K A Corn, P C Wainwright, C M Martinez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Alternating regimes of shallow and deep-sea diversification explain a species-richness paradox in marine fishes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  2. The rise of biting during the Cenozoic fueled reef fish body shape diversification.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

S A PriceDepartment of Biological Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1389-8521
O LaroucheDepartment of Biological Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA.
S T FriedmanDepartment of Evolution and Ecology, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
K A CornDepartment of Evolution and Ecology, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
P C WainwrightDepartment of Evolution and Ecology, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
C M MartinezDepartment of Evolution and Ecology, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The measurement and analysis of phenotypes is often a rate-limiting step for many integrative organismal studies but engaging undergraduate researchers can help overcome this challenge. We present a practical guide to implementing a quantitative specimen-based Course-based Undergraduate Research Experience (CURE), which trains students to collect phenotypic data and mentors them through the entire scientific process using the data they help to collect. Direct access to specimens is not necessary to implement this undergraduate research experience, as recent efforts to digitize museum collections along with online image archives allow data extraction to take place in any classroom. We focus in particular on hypothesis development and quantitative skills, as they are essential for modern biological discovery but are rarely emphasized in traditional lecture-based classes. We have implemented this experience, focusing on collecting and analyzing body shape data across fishes, at two institutions with a total of 39 students. It has so far resulted in 14 talks and 4 posters presented by students at local symposia and 2 scientific papers in preparation with undergraduate co-authors. Moreover, the students had a positive experience that, according to their own assessment, improved their critical thinking and analytical skills as well as their knowledge of science and the scientific process.

Identifiers

PMID33791548
PMCPMC7671122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.