ArticleIntegrative organismal biology (Oxford, England)2019
A Practical Guide to Sliding and Surface Semilandmarks in Morphometric Analyses.
Article in Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
57 citing papers in PubMed.
- When Virchow's law fails: Crouzon syndrome as a test case for quantitative suture closure-endocranial shape relationships.Journal of anatomy · 2026Article
- Relationships between human tibia diaphysis shape and experimental injury outcomes.Journal of forensic sciences · 2026Article
- The impact of alignment and scaling on biological inferences from landmark-free morphometrics.Journal of anatomy · 2026Article
- Morphological Divergence Without Genetic Differentiation in Widely Distributed ChineseBiology · 2026Article
- Sex Estimation Based on the Cranial Base of Three-Dimensional Skull Models from the Bosnia and Herzegovina Population Using Geometric Morphometrics.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- Three-Dimensional Variation of the Human Hard Palate Across Populations: A Geometric Morphometrics Study.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Neural crest cell biology shapes lizard skull evolution across evolutionary time scales.Evolution letters · 2026Article
- Research Trends, Hotspots and Future Perspectives of Geometric Morphometrics in Entomology: A Scientometric Review.Insects · 2026Review
- A suture in time: The ontogeny of cranial suture morphology in mammals.Journal of anatomy · 2026Article
- A geometric morphometrics approach to sex estimation of infants from 0 to 6 years using the auricular surface.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Effects of Ceratotrichia Diameter and Packing Density on Chimaera Pectoral Fin Kinematics.Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Comparative study of fetal facial shape between Japanese and North American populations using micro-CT.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Accelerated evolution increased craniofacial divergence between humans and great apes.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
- Quantitative Analysis of Male Versus Female Frontal Bone and Orbital Skeletal Morphology.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
- Assessing the application of landmark-free morphometrics to macroevolutionary analyses.BMC ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Size, not phylogeny, explains the morphology of the endosseous labyrinth in the crown clade Crocodylia.Journal of anatomy · 2025Article
- Landmark-free statistical shape modelling reveals effects of age and sex on whole muscle morphology among the triceps surae.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
- Brain shapes of large-bodied, flightless ratites (Aves: Palaeognathae) emerge through distinct developmental allometries.Royal Society open science · 2024Article
- Three-dimensional modelling of aortic leaflet coaptation and load-bearing surfaces: in silico design of aortic valve neocuspidizations.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2024Article
- Shape variation and sex differences of the adult human mandible evaluated by geometric morphometrics.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advances in imaging technologies, such as computed tomography (CT) and surface scanning, have facilitated the rapid generation of large datasets of high-resolution three-dimensional (3D) specimen reconstructions in recent years. The wealth of phenotypic information available from these datasets has the potential to inform our understanding of morphological variation and evolution. However, the ever-increasing ease of compiling 3D datasets has created an urgent need for sophisticated methods of capturing high-density shape data that reflect the biological complexity in form. Landmarks often do not take full advantage of the rich shape information available from high-resolution 3D specimen reconstructions, as they are typically restricted to sutures or processes that can be reliably identified across specimens and exclude most of the surface morphology. The development of sliding and surface semilandmark techniques has greatly enhanced the quantification of shape, but their application to diverse datasets can be challenging, especially when dealing with the variable absence of some regions within a structure. Using comprehensive 3D datasets of crania that span the entire clades of birds, squamates and caecilians, we demonstrate methods for capturing morphology across incredibly diverse shapes. We detail many of the difficulties associated with applying semilandmarks to comparable regions across highly disparate structures, and provide solutions to some of these challenges, while considering the consequences of decisions one makes in applying these approaches. Finally, we analyze the benefits of high-density sliding semilandmark approaches over landmark-only studies for capturing shape across diverse organisms and discuss the promise of these approaches for the study of organismal form.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.