Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33791427›Full record

ReviewACS central science2021

Design Strategies for Enhanced Conductivity in Metal-Organic Frameworks.

Eric M Johnson, Stefan Ilic, Amanda J Morris

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS central science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Ion-Electron Coupling-Driven Redox Behavior in Metal-Organic Frameworks.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Metal-Organic Framework-Based Supercapacitors: A Comprehensive Review.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Non-Aqueous Electrochemical COSmall (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Electrically conductive [FeChemical science · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eric M JohnsonDepartment of Chemistry, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061-0131, United States.
Stefan IlicDepartment of Chemistry, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061-0131, United States.
Amanda J MorrisDepartment of Chemistry, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061-0131, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are a class of materials which exhibit permanent porosity, high surface area, and crystallinity. As a highly tunable middle ground between heterogeneous and homogeneous species, MOFs have the potential to suit a wide variety of applications, many of which require conductive materials. The continued development of conductive MOFs has provided an ever-growing library of materials with both intrinsic and guest-promoted conductivity, and factors which limit or enhance conductivity in MOFs have become more apparent. In this Outlook, the factors which are believed to influence the future of MOF conductivity most heavily are highlighted along with proposed methods of further developing these fields. Fundamental studies derived from these methods may provide pathways to raise conductivity across a wide range of MOF structures.

Identifiers

PMID33791427
PMCPMC8006162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.