Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33791337›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in molecular biosciences2021

The TRAIL in the Treatment of Human Cancer: An Update on Clinical Trials.

Martin Snajdauf, Klara Havlova, Jiri Vachtenheim, Andrej Ozaniak, Robert Lischke, Jirina Bartunkova, Daniel Smrz, Zuzana Strizova

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 103 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
103citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

103 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 173 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. DR5 CAR-T cells target melanoma and suppress MDSCs with minimal toxicity.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Clustering of Membrane Receptors: Insights from DNA Origami-Based Approaches.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

43 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Martin SnajdaufThird Department of Surgery, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czechia.
Klara HavlovaDepartment of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czechia.
Jiri VachtenheimThird Department of Surgery, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czechia.
Andrej OzaniakThird Department of Surgery, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czechia.
Robert LischkeThird Department of Surgery, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czechia.
Jirina BartunkovaDepartment of Immunology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czechia.
Daniel SmrzDepartment of Immunology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czechia.
Zuzana StrizovaDepartment of Immunology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czechia.
Charles University · CZUniversity Hospital in Motol · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

TRAIL (tumor-necrosis factor related apoptosis-inducing ligand, CD253) and its death receptors TRAIL-R1 and TRAIL-R2 selectively trigger the apoptotic cell death in tumor cells. For that reason, TRAIL has been extensively studied as a target of cancer therapy. In spite of the promising preclinical observations, the TRAIL-based therapies in humans have certain limitations. The two main therapeutic approaches are based on either an administration of TRAIL-receptor (TRAIL-R) agonists or a recombinant TRAIL. These approaches, however, seem to elicit a limited therapeutic efficacy, and only a few drugs have entered the phase II clinical trials. To deliver TRAIL-based therapies with higher anti-tumor potential several novel TRAIL-derivates and modifications have been designed. These novel drugs are, however, mostly preclinical, and many problems continue to be unraveled. We have reviewed the current status of all TRAIL-based monotherapies and combination therapies that have reached phase II and phase III clinical trials in humans. We have also aimed to introduce all novel approaches of TRAIL utilization in cancer treatment and discussed the most promising drugs which are likely to enter clinical trials in humans. To date, different strategies were introduced in order to activate anti-tumor immune responses with the aim of achieving the highest efficacy and minimal toxicity.In this review, we discuss the most promising TRAIL-based clinical trials and their therapeutic strategies.

Indexed as

cancerdulanerminmapatumumabrecombinant TRAILTRAIL clinical trialsTRAIL-receptor agonists

Identifiers

PMID33791337
PMCPMC8006409
OpenAlexW3134372476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.