Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33790931›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2021

Enrico Battiston, Stéphane Compant, Livio Antonielli, Vincenzo Mondello, Christophe Clément, Andrea Simoni, Stefano Di Marco, Laura Mugnai, Florence Fontaine

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Frontiers in plant science · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Enrico BattistonDipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Agrarie, Alimentari, Ambientali e Forestali - Sezione Patologia Vegetale ed Entomologia, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Firenze, Italy.
Stéphane CompantBioresources Unit, Center for Health and Bioresources, AIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH, Tulln, Austria.
Livio AntonielliBioresources Unit, Center for Health and Bioresources, AIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH, Tulln, Austria.
Vincenzo MondelloUniversité de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Unité Résistance Induite et Bioprotection des Plantes, SFR Condorcet FR CNRS 3417, Reims, France.
Christophe ClémentUniversité de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Unité Résistance Induite et Bioprotection des Plantes, SFR Condorcet FR CNRS 3417, Reims, France.
Andrea SimoniDipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Agroalimentari, Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Stefano Di MarcoIstituto per la Bioeconomia, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Bologna, Italy.
Laura MugnaiDipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Agrarie, Alimentari, Ambientali e Forestali - Sezione Patologia Vegetale ed Entomologia, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Firenze, Italy.
Florence FontaineUniversité de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Unité Résistance Induite et Bioprotection des Plantes, SFR Condorcet FR CNRS 3417, Reims, France.
Austrian Institute of Technology · ATCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversité de Reims Champagne-Ardenne · FRUniversity of Bologna · ITUniversity of Florence · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Grapevine trunk diseases (GTDs) are a serious and growing threat to vineyards worldwide. The need for innovative control tools persists since pesticides used against some GTDs have been banned and only methods to prevent infections or to reduce foliar symptoms have been developed so far. In this context, the application of imaging methods, already applied to study plant-microbe interactions, represents an interesting approach to understand the effect of experimental treatments applied to reduce fungal colonization, on GTD-related pathogens activity. To this aim, trials were carried out to evaluate the efficacy of copper-based treatments, formulated with hydroxyapatite (HA) as co-adjuvant with innovative delivery properties, loaded with two different copper(II) compounds (tribasic sulfate and sulfate pentahydrate), and applied to grapevine propagation material to inhibit fungal wood colonization. The treated rootstock (

Indexed as

colonizationformulationfungicidehydroxyapatitenurseryplant defense

Identifiers

PMID33790931
PMCPMC8005723
OpenAlexW3137302909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.