Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33790901›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2021

Association of a Network of Immunologic Response and Clinical Features With the Functional Recovery From Crotalinae Snakebite Envenoming.

Charles J Gerardo, Elizabeth Silvius, Seth Schobel, John C Eppensteiner, Lauren M McGowan, Eric A Elster, Allan D Kirk, Alexander T Limkakeng

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02182180 (Surgical Critical Care InitiativeTissue and Data Acquisition Protocol), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02182180 recruitingnot on this map

Surgical Critical Care InitiativeTissue and Data Acquisition Protocol

TypeobservationalSponsorHenry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military MedicineRan2014 to 2027Enrolled5,000ConditionsCritical Illness
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Charles J GerardoDepartment of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Elizabeth SilviusDecisionQ, Arlington, VA, United States.
Seth SchobelDepartment of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, United States.
John C EppensteinerDepartment of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Lauren M McGowanDepartment of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Eric A ElsterDepartment of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Allan D KirkDepartment of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Alexander T LimkakengDepartment of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Duke University · USUniformed Services University of the Health Sciences · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The immunologic pathways activated during snakebite envenoming (SBE) are poorly described, and their association with recovery is unclear. The immunologic response in SBE could inform a prognostic model to predict recovery. The purpose of this study was to develop pre- and post-antivenom prognostic models comprised of clinical features and immunologic cytokine data that are associated with recovery from SBE. Materials and Methods: We performed a prospective cohort study in an academic medical center emergency department. We enrolled consecutive patients with Crotalinae SBE and obtained serum samples based on previously described criteria for the Surgical Critical Care Initiative (SC2i)(ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02182180). We assessed a standard set of clinical variables and measured 35 unique cytokines using Luminex Cytokine 35-Plex Human Panel pre- and post-antivenom administration. The Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS), a well-validated patient-reported outcome of functional recovery, was assessed at 0, 7, 14, 21 and 28 days and the area under the patient curve (PSFS AUPC) determined. We performed Bayesian Belief Network (BBN) modeling to represent relationships with a diagram composed of nodes and arcs. Each node represents a cytokine or clinical feature and each arc represents a joint-probability distribution (JPD). Results: Twenty-eight SBE patients were enrolled. Preliminary results from 24 patients with clinical data, 9 patients with pre-antivenom and 11 patients with post-antivenom cytokine data are presented. The group was mostly female (82%) with a mean age of 38.1 (SD ± 9.8) years. In the pre-antivenom model, the variables most closely associated with the PSFS AUPC are predominantly clinical features. In the post-antivenom model, cytokines are more fully incorporated into the model. The variables most closely associated with the PSFS AUPC are age, antihistamines, white blood cell count (WBC), HGF, CCL5 and VEGF. The most influential variables are age, antihistamines and EGF. Both the pre- and post-antivenom models perform well with AUCs of 0.87 and 0.90 respectively. Discussion: Pre- and post-antivenom networks of cytokines and clinical features were associated with functional recovery measured by the PSFS AUPC over 28 days. With additional data, we can identify prognostic models using immunologic and clinical variables to predict recovery from SBE.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnimalsAntiveninsBiomarkersCrotalid VenomsCrotalinaeCytokinesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, ImmunologicalPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesRecovery of FunctionAntiveninsBiomarkersCrotalid VenomsCytokinesantiveninchemokinecytokinePatient Specific Functional Scalepredictive modelingprognostic modelsnake bite

Identifiers

PMID33790901
PMCPMC8006329
OpenAlexW3137729934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.