Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33790548›Full record

ArticleClinical interventions in aging2021

Development and Psychometric Validation of a New Scale for Assessment and Screening of Frailty Among Older Indians.

Karishma De, Joyita Banerjee, Sreerag P Rajan, Prasun Chatterjee, Avinash Chakrawarty, Maroof A Khan, Vishwajeet Singh, Aparajit B Dey

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical interventions in aging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Karishma DeDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Joyita BanerjeeDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-3432-9782
Sreerag P RajanDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Prasun ChatterjeeDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Avinash ChakrawartyDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Maroof A KhanDepartment of Biostatistics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Vishwajeet SinghDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Aparajit B DeyDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0979-9413
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFrailty is a major challenge for healthcare systems in ageing societies. This dynamic state of health is a reflection of reduced reserve in various organ systems and enhanced vulnerability to stressors. Research in this area of geriatrics and gerontology is limited in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) like India. This study is directed at development of a culturally appropriate and validated assessment scale for frailty among older Indians.

methodsAfter extensive review of the literature on existing scales, a preliminary draft scale was formed. This draft was pre- and pilot-tested to check feasibility and modified accordingly. The final scale was validated on 107 older adults by confirmatory factor analysis and was named the Frailty Assessment and Screening Tool (FAST). The Fried's frailty phenotype was also administered on the same 107 older adults and scores of both were co-related. Suitable cut-off scores were found for frail and pre-frail older adults.

resultsThe final version of the FAST consisted of 14 questions pertaining to 10 domains. It has good reliability. Cronbach's alpha co-efficient was 0.99; test-retest reliability was 0.97 and validity by confirmatory factor analysis was adequate. The Kaiser-CMeyer-Olkin (KMO) of sampling adequacy was 0.699, and Bartlett's test of sphericity was significant (

conclusionThe FAST is a validated tool with good psychometric properties. It is expected that it will be helpful in screening pre-frail and frail older adults in India and other LMICs and guide in clinical decision making for intervention.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingAgedAged, 80 and overFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleFrail ElderlyFrailtyGeriatric AssessmentHumansIndiaMaleMass ScreeningPostural BalancePsychometricsReproducibility of Resultsfrailtypre-frailpsychometryrobustscreening tool

Identifiers

PMID33790548
PMCPMC8007478
OpenAlexW3137687657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.