Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33790328›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

The role of the size in thyroid cancer risk stratification.

Federica Vianello, Simona Censi, Sara Watutantrige-Fernando, Susi Barollo, Yi Hang Zhu, Nora Albiger, Loris Bertazza, Jacopo Manso, Sofia Carducci, Clara Benna and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Federica Vianello *Department of Radiotherapy, Istituto Oncologico Veneto-IRCCS, Padua, Italy.
Simona Censi *Endocrinology Unit, Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Sara Watutantrige-FernandoFamily Cancer Clinic, Istituto Oncologico Veneto-IRCCS, Padua, Italy.
Susi BarolloEndocrinology Unit, Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Yi Hang ZhuEndocrinology Unit, Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Nora AlbigerDepartment of Radiotherapy, Istituto Oncologico Veneto-IRCCS, Padua, Italy.
Loris BertazzaEndocrinology Unit, Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Jacopo MansoEndocrinology Unit, Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Sofia CarducciEndocrinology Unit, Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Clara BennaSurgery Unit, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences (DiSCOG), University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Maurizio IacoboneEndocrine Surgery Unit, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences (DiSCOG), University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Francesca GaluppiniSurgical Pathology and Cytopathology Unit, Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Gianmaria PennelliSurgical Pathology and Cytopathology Unit, Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Caterina MianEndocrinology Unit, Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, Padua, Italy. caterina.mian@unipd.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Only a minority of cases of differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) have a poor clinical outcome. Clinical outcomes and molecular aspects were assessed in: 144 DTC ≤ 40 mm without distant metastases (group 1); 50 DTC > 40 mm without distant metastases (group 2); and 46 DTC with distant metastases (group 3). Group 3 had a worse outcome than the other two groups: during the follow-up, patients more frequently had persistent disease, died, or underwent further treatment. The outcomes did not differ between groups 1 and 2. Group 3 had a higher prevalence of TERT promoter mutations than group 2 (32.6% vs 14%). Group 1 had a higher frequency of BRAF mutations than groups 2 or 3 (61.1% vs 16.0% and 26.1%, respectively), while RAS mutations were more common in group 2 than in groups 1 and 3 (16.0% vs 2.1% and 6.5%, respectively). Groups 1 and 2 shared the same outcome, but were genetically distinct. Only lymph node involvement, distant metastases, older age and (among the molecular markers) TERT promoter mutations were independent predictors of a worse outcome. Metastatic DTC had the worst outcome, while the outcome was identical for large and small non-metastatic DTC, although they showed different molecular patterns. TERT promoter mutations emerged as an independent factor pointing to a poor prognosis.

Indexed as

Tumor BurdenAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMutationNeoplasm MetastasisProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafTelomeraseThyroid NeoplasmsBRAF protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafTelomeraseTERT protein, human

Identifiers

PMID33790328
PMCPMC8012699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.