Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33790294›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

Connecting structure to function with the recovery of over 1000 high-quality metagenome-assembled genomes from activated sludge using long-read sequencing.

Caitlin M Singleton, Francesca Petriglieri, Jannie M Kristensen, Rasmus H Kirkegaard, Thomas Y Michaelsen, Martin H Andersen, Zivile Kondrotaite, Søren M Karst, Morten S Dueholm, Per H Nielsen and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 173 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
173citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

173 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Microorganisms · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Progress in interventions for vaginal microecology.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. A genomic view of Earth's biomes.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

113 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Caitlin M SingletonCenter for Microbial Communities, Department of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9688-8208
Francesca PetriglieriCenter for Microbial Communities, Department of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Jannie M KristensenCenter for Microbial Communities, Department of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Rasmus H KirkegaardCenter for Microbial Communities, Department of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Thomas Y MichaelsenCenter for Microbial Communities, Department of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Martin H AndersenCenter for Microbial Communities, Department of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-5289-2034
Zivile KondrotaiteCenter for Microbial Communities, Department of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Søren M KarstCenter for Microbial Communities, Department of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Morten S DueholmCenter for Microbial Communities, Department of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-4135-2670
Per H NielsenCenter for Microbial Communities, Department of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark. phn@bio.aau.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-6402-1877
Mads AlbertsenCenter for Microbial Communities, Department of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark. ma@bio.aau.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-6151-190X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microorganisms play crucial roles in water recycling, pollution removal and resource recovery in the wastewater industry. The structure of these microbial communities is increasingly understood based on 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing data. However, such data cannot be linked to functional potential in the absence of high-quality metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) for nearly all species. Here, we use long-read and short-read sequencing to recover 1083 high-quality MAGs, including 57 closed circular genomes, from 23 Danish full-scale wastewater treatment plants. The MAGs account for ~30% of the community based on relative abundance, and meet the stringent MIMAG high-quality draft requirements including full-length rRNA genes. We use the information provided by these MAGs in combination with >13 years of 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing data, as well as Raman microspectroscopy and fluorescence in situ hybridisation, to uncover abundant undescribed lineages belonging to important functional groups.

Indexed as

BacteriaBioreactorsDenmarkGenome, BacterialHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMetagenomeMetagenomicsMicrobiotaPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 23SRNA, Ribosomal, 5SSewageWastewaterWater PurificationRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 23SRNA, Ribosomal, 5SSewageWastewater

Identifiers

PMID33790294
PMCPMC8012365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.