Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33790201›Full record

ReviewPsychosomatic medicine2021

Biobehavioral Aspects of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Review.

Peter A Hall, Paschal Sheeran, Geoffrey T Fong, Charissa S L Cheah, Mark Oremus, Teresa Liu-Ambrose, Mohammad N Sakib, Zahid A Butt, Hasan Ayaz, Narveen Jandu and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Psychosomatic medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Driving, Social Distancing, Protective, and Coping Behaviors of Older Adults Before and During COVID-19.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Cognitive symptoms after COVID-19.Neurology perspectives · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Conceptualizing COVID-19 syndemics: A scoping review.Journal of multimorbidity and comorbidity
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Peter A HallFrom the School of Public Health Sciences (Hall, Fong, Oremus, Sakib, Butt, Jandu, Morita) and Department of Psychology (Hall, Fong), University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada; Department of Psychology and Neuroscience (Sheeran), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research (Fong), Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Psychology (Cheah), University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine (Liu-Ambrose), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; School of Biomedical Engineering, Science and Health Systems (Ayaz) and Department of Psychology, College of Arts and Sciences (Ayaz), Drexel University; and Department of Family and Community Health (Ayaz), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Paschal Sheeran
Geoffrey T Fong
Charissa S L Cheah
Mark Oremus
Teresa Liu-Ambrose
Mohammad N Sakib
Zahid A Butt
Hasan Ayaz
Narveen Jandu
Plinio P Morita
Bridge University · SSUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis review highlights the scope and significance of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic with a focus on biobehavioral aspects and critical avenues for research.

methodsA narrative review of the published research literature was undertaken, highlighting major empirical findings emerging during the first and second waves of the COVID-19 pandemic.

resultsInteractions among biological, behavioral, and societal processes were prominent across all regions of the globe during the first year of the COVID-19 emergency. Affective, cognitive, behavioral, socioeconomic, and technological factors all played a significant role in the spread of infection, response precautions, and outcomes of mitigation efforts. Affective symptoms, suicidality, and cognitive dysfunction have been widely described consequences of the infection, the economic fallout, and the necessary public health mitigation measures themselves. The impact of COVID-19 may be especially serious for those living with severe mental illness and/or chronic medical diseases, given the confluence of several adverse factors in a manner that appears to have syndemic potential.

conclusionsThe COVID-19 pandemic has made clear that biological and behavioral factors interact with societal processes in the infectious disease context. Empirical research examining mechanistic pathways from infection and recovery to immunological, behavioral, and emotional outcomes is critical. Examination of how emotional and behavioral factors relate to the pandemic-both as causes and as effects-can provide valuable insights that can improve management of the current pandemic and future pandemics to come.

Indexed as

COVID-19FearHumansLife StyleMental HealthPandemicsRacismSocial Determinants of HealthSuicide

Identifiers

PMID33790201
PMCPMC8115744
OpenAlexW3141099888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.