Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33790200›Full record

ArticlePsychosomatic medicine

Cognitive Defusion Is a Core Cognitive Mechanism for the Sensory-Affective Uncoupling of Pain During Mindfulness Meditation.

Jelle Zorn, Oussama Abdoun, Sandrine Sonié, Antoine Lutz

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychosomatic medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03117478 (The Impact of Meditation Practice on Attention and Emotion Regulation), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03117478 nacompletednot on this map

The Impact of Meditation Practice on Attention and Emotion Regulation :Studies on Neural Correlation in Brain Imagery and Biomarkers of Stress and Inflammation

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospices Civils de LyonRan2016 to 2019Enrolled169ConditionsHealthyArmsMagneto-encephalography (MEG), Electro-encephalography (EEG), Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI), Anatomical Magnetic Resonance Imaging (aMRI), Meditation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jelle ZornFrom the Lyon Neuroscience Research Centre, INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292, Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France.
Oussama Abdoun
Sandrine Sonié
Antoine Lutz

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMindfulness meditation can downregulate the experience of pain. However, its specific underlying regulatory mechanisms are still largely unknown. Here, we aimed to investigate the role of cognitive defusion-a form of psychological distancing from internal experiences-in mindfulness-based pain regulation.

methodsWe implemented a thermal heat paradigm that was designed to amplify the cognitive-affective aspects of pain in 43 novice meditators (2-day formal training; 51.2% women; 53.2 ± 7.0 years old) and 27 expert meditators (>10,000-hour practice; 44.4% women; 51.9 ± 8.4 years old). We collected pain intensity and unpleasantness reports and trait measures of pain catastrophizing assessed by the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), cognitive defusion assessed by the Drexel Defusion Scale (DDS), and cognitive fusion assessed by the Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire, as well as of several other constructs commonly reported in the literature.

resultsExperts reported lower PCS (6.9 ± 5.2 versus 17.2 ± 8.5, p < .001) but higher DDS (39.4 ± 6.4 versus 28.9 ± 6.6, p < .001) than novices. Across participants, the PCS and DDS were negatively correlated and shared unique variance that survived adjusting for other mindfulness-related and cognitive-emotional constructs (β = -0.64, p < .001). Conversely, the relationships between PCS and other commonly reported constructs did not seem specific, as none of the relationships survived adjusting for DDS (adjusted β < 0.25, p > .05). Further supporting the relevance of DDS to pain, both the DDS and PCS specifically predicted pain unpleasantness as opposed to pain intensity. However, DDS seemed to be a more specific predictor of unpleasantness than PCS, as the relationship between DDS and unpleasantness survived adjusting for PCS (adjusted β = -0.33, p = .016), but not vice versa (adjusted β = 0.20, p = .162). We also found that the Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire showed a similar pattern of associations with PCS and pain self-reports to what was found for the DDS, although these associations were less consistent.

conclusionsCollectively, these findings highlight the central role of cognitive defusion in mindfulness-based pain regulation.

Indexed as

MeditationMindfulnessAdultCognitionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPainPain Measurement

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.