ArticleNeurology2021
Novel Score for Stratifying Risk of Critical Care Needs in Patients With Intracerebral Hemorrhage.
Article in Neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Safety and Outcome of Admission to Step-Down Level of Care in Patients with Low-Risk Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Neurocritical care · 2024Pooled it
- Golden hour management in the patient with intraparenchymal cerebral hemorrhage: an Italian intersociety document.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2025Review
- Elevated basophils in peripheral blood predict lower extremity deep venous thrombosis in non-surgical patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage.Scientific reports · 2025Observational
- Development of a risk predication model for critical care needs in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage: a retrospective cohort.BMC nursing · 2024Article
- C-reactive protein is a predictor for lower-extremity deep venous thrombosis in patients with primary intracerebral hemorrhage.European journal of medical research · 2024Observational
- Radiomics features from perihematomal edema for prediction of prognosis in the patients with basal ganglia hemorrhage.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Admission Dehydration Status Portends Adverse Short-Term Mortality in Patients with Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo develop a risk prediction score identifying patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) at low risk for critical care.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed data of 451 patients with ICH between 2010 and 2018. The sample was randomly divided into a development and a validation cohort. Logistic regression was used to develop a risk score by weighting independent predictors of intensive care unit (ICU) needs according to strength of association. The risk score was tested in the validation cohort and externally validated in a dataset from another institution.
resultsThe rate of ICU interventions was 80.3%. Systolic blood pressure (SBP), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), and ICH volume were independent predictors of critical care, resulting in the following point assignments for the Intensive Care Triaging in Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage (INTRINSIC) score: SBP 160 to 190 mm Hg (1 point), SBP >190 mm Hg (3 points); GCS 8 to 13 (1 point), GCS <8 (3 points); ICH volume 16 to 40 cm
conclusionThe INTRINSIC score identifies patients with ICH who are at low risk for critical care interventions. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that the INTRINSIC score identifies patients with ICH at low risk for critical care interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.