Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33789985›Full record

ArticleJournal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)2021

Integral Use of Immunopeptidomics and Immunoinformatics for the Characterization of Antigen Presentation and Rational Identification of BoLA-DR-Presented Peptides and Epitopes.

Andressa Fisch, Birkir Reynisson, Lindert Benedictus, Annalisa Nicastri, Deepali Vasoya, Ivan Morrison, Søren Buus, Beatriz Rossetti Ferreira, Isabel Kinney Ferreira de Miranda Santos, Nicola Ternette and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Immunopeptidomics ofBiology · 2024
    Article
  6. New light on the HLA-DR immunopeptidomic landscape.Journal of leukocyte biology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Andressa FischRibeirão Preto College of Nursing, University of São Paulo, Av Bandeirantes, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8380-6565
Birkir ReynissonDepartment of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.
Lindert BenedictusThe Roslin Institute, Edinburgh, Midlothian, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7605-2710
Annalisa NicastriThe Jenner Institute, Nuffield Department of Medicine, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Deepali VasoyaThe Roslin Institute, Edinburgh, Midlothian, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6764-5418
Ivan MorrisonThe Roslin Institute, Edinburgh, Midlothian, United Kingdom.
Søren BuusLaboratory of Experimental Immunology, Department of Immunology and Microbiology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-8363-1999
Beatriz Rossetti FerreiraRibeirão Preto College of Nursing, University of São Paulo, Av Bandeirantes, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
Isabel Kinney Ferreira de Miranda SantosRibeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0438-4430
Nicola TernetteThe Jenner Institute, Nuffield Department of Medicine, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Tim ConnelleyThe Roslin Institute, Edinburgh, Midlothian, United Kingdom.
Morten NielsenDepartment of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark morni@dtu.dk.ORCID 0000-0001-7885-4311

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/D/20002174NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272201200010C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MHC peptide binding and presentation is the most selective event defining the landscape of T cell epitopes. Consequently, understanding the diversity of MHC alleles in a given population and the parameters that define the set of ligands that can be bound and presented by each of these alleles (the immunopeptidome) has an enormous impact on our capacity to predict and manipulate the potential of protein Ags to elicit functional T cell responses. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of MHC-eluted ligand data has proven to be a powerful technique for identifying such peptidomes, and methods integrating such data for prediction of Ag presentation have reached a high level of accuracy for both MHC class I and class II. In this study, we demonstrate how these techniques and prediction methods can be readily extended to the bovine leukocyte Ag class II DR locus (BoLA-DR). BoLA-DR binding motifs were characterized by eluted ligand data derived from bovine cell lines expressing a range of DRB3 alleles prevalent in Holstein-Friesian populations. The model generated (NetBoLAIIpan, available as a Web server at www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/NetBoLAIIpan) was shown to have unprecedented predictive power to identify known BoLA-DR-restricted CD4 epitopes. In summary, the results demonstrate the power of an integrated approach combining advanced mass spectrometry peptidomics with immunoinformatics for characterization of the BoLA-DR Ag presentation system and provide a prediction tool that can be used to assist in rational evaluation and selection of bovine CD4 T cell epitopes.

Indexed as

Antigen PresentationAllelesAnimalsBase SequenceCattleCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCells, CulturedComputational BiologyComputer SimulationEpitopes, T-LymphocyteHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHistocompatibility Antigens Class IILigandsMass SpectrometryPeptidesProtein BindingBoLA-DRB3 antigenEpitopes, T-LymphocyteHistocompatibility Antigens Class IILigandsPeptides

Identifiers

PMID33789985
PMCPMC8113073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.