Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33789956›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2021

Analysis of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis Isolates Recovered from Deceased Mammals of a German Zoo Animal Collection.

J A Hammerl, N Vom Ort, A Barac, C Jäckel, L Grund, S Dreyer, C Heydel, A Kuczka, H Peters, S Hertwig

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Characterisation ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Veterinary sciences · 2025
    Review
  6. Impact and Diversity of ESBL-ProducingAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  7. Case report: First isolation ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

J A HammerlGerman Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Department of Biological Safety, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6930-4358
N Vom OrtGerman Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Department of Biological Safety, Berlin, Germany.
A BaracGerman Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Department of Biological Safety, Berlin, Germany.
C JäckelGerman Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Department of Biological Safety, Berlin, Germany.
L GrundDer Grüne Zoo Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany.
S DreyerDer Grüne Zoo Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany.
C HeydelJustus-Liebig University Giessen, Institute of Hygiene and Infectious Diseases of Animals, Giessen, Germany.
A KuczkaChemisches- und Veterinäruntersuchungsamt Rhein-Ruhr-Wupper, Fachgebiete Pathologie und Bakteriologie/Mykologie, Krefeld, Germany.
H PetersChemisches- und Veterinäruntersuchungsamt Rhein-Ruhr-Wupper, Fachgebiete Pathologie und Bakteriologie/Mykologie, Krefeld, Germany.
S HertwigGerman Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Department of Biological Safety, Berlin, Germany stefan.hertwig@bfr.bund.de.
Federal Institute for Risk Assessment · DEUniversity of Wuppertal · DEJustus-Liebig-Universität Gießen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Yersinia enterocoliticaYersinia pseudotuberculosisYersinia pseudotuberculosis InfectionsAnimalsAnimals, ZooGermanyHumansMammalsantimicrobial resistancediversitygenomeplasmidprophagevirulence factorYersiniazoo animals

Identifiers

PMID33789956
PMCPMC8315957
OpenAlexW3142425689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.