Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33789903›Full record

ArticleScience advances2021

Deep-sea predator niche segregation revealed by combined cetacean biologging and eDNA analysis of cephalopod prey.

F Visser, V J Merten, T Bayer, M G Oudejans, D S W de Jonge, O Puebla, T B H Reusch, J Fuss, H J T Hoving

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Reference genome of the leopard seal (Frontiers in genetics · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Atlantic Oceanic Squids in the "Grey Speciation Zone".Integrative and comparative biology · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Key questions in marine mammal bioenergetics.Conservation physiology · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

F VisserDepartment of Freshwater and Marine Ecology, IBED, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. f.visser@uva.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-1024-3244
V J MertenGEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1154-1585
T BayerGEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4704-2449
M G OudejansKelp Marine Research, Hoorn, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4212-6712
D S W de JongeDeep-Sea Ecology and Biogeochemistry Research Group, The Lyell Centre for Earth and Marine Science and Technology, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4093-2721
O PueblaGEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9700-5841
T B H ReuschGEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8961-4337
J FussInstitute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7631-9355
H J T HovingGEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4330-6507
GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel · DEKema International (Netherlands) · NLCarl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg · DEChristian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel · DEHeriot-Watt University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fundamental insight on predator-prey dynamics in the deep sea is hampered by a lack of combined data on hunting behavior and prey spectra. Deep-sea niche segregation may evolve when predators target specific prey communities, but this hypothesis remains untested. We combined environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding with biologging to assess cephalopod community composition in the deep-sea foraging habitat of two top predator cetaceans. Risso's dolphin and Cuvier's beaked whale selectively targeted distinct epi/meso- and bathypelagic foraging zones, holding eDNA of 39 cephalopod taxa, including 22 known prey. Contrary to expectation, extensive taxonomic overlap in prey spectra between foraging zones indicated that predator niche segregation was not driven by prey community composition alone. Instead, intraspecific prey spectrum differences may drive differentiation for hunting fewer, more calorific, mature cephalopods in deeper waters. The novel combination of methods presented here holds great promise to disclose elusive deep-sea predator-prey systems, aiding in their protection.

Indexed as

CephalopodaDNA, EnvironmentalAnimalsEcosystemPredatory BehaviorWhalesDNA, Environmental

Identifiers

PMID33789903
PMCPMC8011969
OpenAlexW3145133979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.