Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33789660›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2021

Predicting unplanned medical visits among patients with diabetes: translation from machine learning to clinical implementation.

Arielle Selya, Drake Anshutz, Emily Griese, Tess L Weber, Benson Hsu, Cheryl Ward

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Applying Machine Learning Techniques to Implementation Science.Online journal of public health informatics · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Arielle SelyaDepartment of Population Health, University of North Dakota School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Grand Forks, ND, USA. Arielle.Selya@SanfordHealth.org.ORCID 0000-0001-7026-6988
Drake AnshutzBehavioral Sciences Group, Sanford Research, 2301 East 60th Street North, Sioux Falls, SD, 57104, USA.
Emily GrieseBehavioral Sciences Group, Sanford Research, 2301 East 60th Street North, Sioux Falls, SD, 57104, USA.
Tess L WeberBehavioral Sciences Group, Sanford Research, 2301 East 60th Street North, Sioux Falls, SD, 57104, USA.
Benson HsuDepartment of Pediatrics, University of South Dakota Sanford School of Medicine, Sioux Falls, SD, USA.
Cheryl WardBehavioral Sciences Group, Sanford Research, 2301 East 60th Street North, Sioux Falls, SD, 57104, USA.
Sanford Health · USAvera Health · USSaint Luke's Health System · USSanford Research · USUniversity of South Dakota · US

Funding

Transdisciplinary approaches to American Indian and rural population health researchP20GM121341 · NIGMS · SANFORD RESEARCH/USD · PI PUUMALA, SUSAN E · 2017 to 2022
$11.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM121341
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiabetes is a medical and economic burden in the United States. In this study, a machine learning predictive model was developed to predict unplanned medical visits among patients with diabetes, and findings were used to design a clinical intervention in the sponsoring healthcare organization. This study presents a case study of how predictive analytics can inform clinical actions, and describes practical factors that must be incorporated in order to translate research into clinical practice.

methodsData were drawn from electronic medical records (EMRs) from a large healthcare organization in the Northern Plains region of the US, from adult (≥ 18 years old) patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes who received care at least once during the 3-year period. A variety of machine-learning classification models were run using standard EMR variables as predictors (age, body mass index (BMI), systolic blood pressure (BP), diastolic BP, low-density lipoprotein, high-density lipoprotein (HDL), glycohemoglobin (A1C), smoking status, number of diagnoses and number of prescriptions). The best-performing model after cross-validation testing was analyzed to identify strongest predictors.

resultsThe best-performing model was a linear-basis support vector machine, which achieved a balanced accuracy (average of sensitivity and specificity) of 65.7%. This model outperformed a conventional logistic regression by 0.4 percentage points. A sensitivity analysis identified BP and HDL as the strongest predictors, such that disrupting these variables with random noise decreased the model's overall balanced accuracy by 1.3 and 1.4 percentage points, respectively. These recommendations, along with stakeholder engagement, behavioral economics strategies, and implementation science principles helped to inform the design of a clinical intervention targeting behavioral changes.

conclusionOur machine-learning predictive model more accurately predicted unplanned medical visits among patients with diabetes, relative to conventional models. Post-hoc analysis of the model was used for hypothesis generation, namely that HDL and BP are the strongest contributors to unplanned medical visits among patients with diabetes. These findings were translated into a clinical intervention now being piloted at the sponsoring healthcare organization. In this way, this predictive model can be used in moving from prediction to implementation and improved diabetes care management in clinical settings.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2AdolescentAdultElectronic Health RecordsHumansLogistic ModelsMachine LearningSupport Vector MachineDiabetesMachine learningPredictive modelUnplanned medical visits

Identifiers

PMID33789660
PMCPMC8011134
OpenAlexW3151327540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.