Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33789656›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2021

Recurrence characteristics and clinicopathological results of borderline ovarian tumors.

Lina Niu, Huihui Tian, Yongjun Xu, Jieqiong Cao, Xu Zhang, Junli Zhang, Jiajia Hou, Weiqin Lv, Junxia Wang, Li Xin and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Special Issue "Biomarkers and Early Detection Strategies of Ovarian Tumors".International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Lina NiuDepartment of Gynecology, Yuncheng Central Hospital of Shanxi Province, Yuncheng, 044000, China.
Huihui TianDepartment of Gynecology, Yuncheng Central Hospital of Shanxi Province, Yuncheng, 044000, China.
Yongjun XuDepartment of Pharmacy, Yuncheng Central Hospital of Shanxi Province, Yuncheng, 044000, China.
Jieqiong CaoDepartment of Gynecology, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, NO.85 South Jiefang Road, Yingze District, Taiyuan, 030001, China.
Xu ZhangDepartment of Gynecology, Yuncheng Central Hospital of Shanxi Province, Yuncheng, 044000, China.
Junli ZhangDepartment of Gynecology, Yuncheng Central Hospital of Shanxi Province, Yuncheng, 044000, China.
Jiajia HouDepartment of Gynecology, Yuncheng Central Hospital of Shanxi Province, Yuncheng, 044000, China.
Weiqin LvDepartment of Gynecology, Yuncheng Central Hospital of Shanxi Province, Yuncheng, 044000, China.
Junxia WangDepartment of Gynecology, Yuncheng Central Hospital of Shanxi Province, Yuncheng, 044000, China.
Li XinDepartment of Gynecology, Yuncheng Central Hospital of Shanxi Province, Yuncheng, 044000, China.
XuFeng DongDepartment of Infectious Disease Prevention and Control Division, Shanxi Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Taiyuan, 030012, China.
Tao XuDepartment of Pathology, Yuncheng Central Hospital of Shanxi Province, Yuncheng, 044000, China.
Yuan NanDepartment of Medical Record Management, Yuncheng Central Hospital of Shanxi Province, Yuncheng, 044000, China.
Hua WeiDepartment of Gynecology, Yuncheng Central Hospital of Shanxi Province, Yuncheng, 044000, China.
Xinting ChaiDepartment of Gynecology, Yuncheng Central Hospital of Shanxi Province, Yuncheng, 044000, China.
Na LiDepartment of Gynecology, Yuncheng Central Hospital of Shanxi Province, Yuncheng, 044000, China.
Yan NiDepartment of Gynecology, Taiyuan Central Hospital, Taiyuan, 030000, China.
Yun ShangDepartment of Gynecology, Yuncheng Central Hospital of Shanxi Province, Yuncheng, 044000, China.
Lizhen ZhangDepartment of Gynecology, Yuncheng Central Hospital of Shanxi Province, Yuncheng, 044000, China.
Ye ZhaoDepartment of Gynecology, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, NO.85 South Jiefang Road, Yingze District, Taiyuan, 030001, China. zhaoye_1818@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to investigate the clinical and pathological characteristics, and the recurrence and prognostic factors of borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs).

methodsThe data of 286 patients admitted to hospital and followed up for more than ten months were analyzed retrospectively to study the clinicopathological characteristics and related factors of recurrence.

resultsThe median age of the patients was 42.06 ± 14.97 years, and the duration of the follow-up ranged from 10-109 months. During the follow-up period, 40 patients had a recurrence. Of these patients, 36 were ≤ 40 years, and patients with premenopausal recurrence accounted for 20.5% (36/176). In patients undergoing conservative treatment or radical operations, the recurrence rates were 21.3% and 1.8%, respectively, and they were 13.4% (36/268) in patients at Federation International of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I, and 22.2% (4/18) in patients at an advanced stage. Postoperative pathology revealed that 40 patients had micropapillary tumors, among whom ten patients (25%) had a recurrence, and 19 patients had complications with interstitial infiltration. Of these 19 patients, six had a recurrence (31.5%). Another 22 patients had complications with calcified sand bodies; among these, eight patients (36.4%) had a recurrence. All the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). There were four cancer-related deaths during the follow-up period. Late FIGO stage, conservative operation, and a high level of carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) were independent risk factors for the recurrence of BOTs.

conclusionBOTs usually occur in women under 40 years, have an occult onset, and half of the patients have no obvious clinical manifestations. Serum CA125 level can be used as a tumor marker to detect BOTs and the risk of its recurrence. Operation mode and FIGO stage are important independent factors for the recurrence of BOTs.

Indexed as

Ovarian NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorCA-125 AntigenChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPregnancyPrognosisRetrospective StudiesBiomarkers, TumorCA-125 AntigenCA125Conservative surgeryFIGO stagingOvarian borderline tumorRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID33789656
PMCPMC8011410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.