Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33789611›Full record

SynthesisBMC pregnancy and childbirth2021

Risk factors for non-adherent retained placenta after vaginal delivery: a systematic review.

Alessandro Favilli, Valentina Tosto, Margherita Ceccobelli, Fabio Parazzini, Massimo Franchi, Vittorio Bini, Sandro Gerli

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Novel risk factors associated with retained placenta after vaginal birth.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alessandro FavilliDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AOUI Verona, University of Verona, Piazzale A. Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy.
Valentina TostoDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centre of Perinatal and Reproductive Medicine, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, University of Perugia, 06156, Perugia, Italy.
Margherita CeccobelliDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centre of Perinatal and Reproductive Medicine, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, University of Perugia, 06156, Perugia, Italy.
Fabio ParazziniDepartment of Clinic and Community Science, Mangiagalli Hospital, University of Milan, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Massimo FranchiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AOUI Verona, University of Verona, Piazzale A. Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy.
Vittorio BiniDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, University of Perugia, 06156, Perugia, Italy.
Sandro GerliDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centre of Perinatal and Reproductive Medicine, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, University of Perugia, 06156, Perugia, Italy. sandro.gerli@unipg.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1082-3062

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRetained placenta represents a cause of maternal morbidity and mortality affecting 0.5-3% of all vaginal deliveries. The unpredictability of this condition makes difficult to develop predictive and preventive strategies to apply in clinical practice. This analysis collected and analyzed all known risk factors related to this obstetric complication.

methodsA systematic literature review for all original research articles published between 1990 and 2020 was performed. Observational studies about retained placenta risk factors published in English language were considered eligible. Conference abstracts, untraceable articles and studies focused on morbidly adherent placenta were excluded. The included articles were screened to identify study design, number of enrolled patients and retained placenta risk factors investigated. All stages of the revision followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement.

resultsThirty-five studies met the inclusion criteria. The reported retained placenta prevalence ranged from 0.5 to 4.8%. Maternal age, previous cesarean sections, previous dilation and curettage, previous retained placenta, labor induction, resulted as the most recurrent, independent risk factors for retained placenta. Previous estro-progestins therapy, morphological placental features (weight, shape, insertion of umbilical cord, implantation site), endometriosis, Assisted Reproductive Technologies, Apgar score are fascinating new proposal risk factors.

conclusionsOld and new data are not enough robust to draw firm conclusions. Prospective and well-designed studies, based on a well agreed internationally retained placenta definition, are needed in order to clarify this potential dramatic and life-threatening condition.

Indexed as

Delivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansPlacenta, RetainedPregnancyPrevalenceProspective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsMorbidly adherent placentaPost-partum hemorrhageProlonged third stage of laborRetained placentaRisk factorsVaginal delivery

Identifiers

PMID33789611
PMCPMC8015016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.