Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33789606›Full record

ArticleBMC pediatrics2021

Priorities for intervention to prevent diarrhea among children aged 0-23 months in northeastern Ethiopia: a matched case-control study.

Alemwork Baye, Metadel Adane, Tadesse Sisay, Habtamu Shimels Hailemeskel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Exclusive Breastfeeding and Childhood Morbidity: A Narrative Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alemwork Baye *Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Dessie Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Dessie, Ethiopia.
Metadel Adane *Department of Environmental Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia. metadel.adane2@gmail.com.
Tadesse SisayDepartment of Environmental Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia.
Habtamu Shimels HailemeskelDepartment of Pediatrics and Neonatal Nursing, Health Science College, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia.
Wollo University · ETDebre Tabor University · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe global public health problem of diarrhea is most prevalent in developing countries including Ethiopia, especially among children under two years of age. Limited information on the determinants of diarrhea among children aged 0-23 months hinders the design and prioritization of intervention strategies to address childhood diarrhea in Dessie City, northeastern Ethiopia. Therefore, this study was designed to assess the determinants of diarrhea in order to identify priority interventions for its control.

methodsA community-based matched case-control study was conducted among children aged 0-23 months during January-February 2018. Cases defined as children with acute diarrhea, and controls defined as children without acute diarrhea, were matched by child's age (months) and place of residence (residing in the same kebele, the lowest local administrative unit, each of which has a population of approximately 5000) during the two weeks prior to data collection. Data were collected from mothers/caregivers of the 119 cases and 238 matched controls using a pre-tested structured questionnaire and an observational checklist. Data were analyzed using conditional logistic regression model with 95% confidence interval (CI); variables with p < 0.05 from multivariable analysis were considered as significantly associated with acute diarrhea among children aged 0-23 months.

resultsAge of mothers/caregivers (> 35 years of age) (adjusted matched odds ratio [adjusted mOR] = 2.00; 95% CI: 1.37-5.8); divorced/widowed marital status (adjusted mOR = 1.40; 95% CI: 1.26-3.3); lack of exclusive breastfeeding (adjusted mOR = 2.12; 95% CI: 1.15-3.70); presence of feces within/around latrines (adjusted mOR = 1.37; 95% CI: 1.21-3.50); lack of handwashing facility near latrine (adjusted mOR = 1.50; 95% CI: 1.30-5.30); presence of domestic sewage discharge within and/or outside the compound (adjusted mOR = 3.29; 95% CI: 1.85-7.50) and practice of handwashing at fewer than three of the five critical daily times (adjusted mOR = 4.50; 95% CI: 2.54-9.50) were significantly associated with acute diarrhea among children aged under two years.

conclusionTo reduce acute diarrheal disease among children under two, priority should be given to interventions that focus on improving exclusive breastfeeding practices, regular cleaning of latrines, advocating for availability of handwashing facility within/around latrines, use of proper domestic sewage discharge methods and improving handwashing practice at the five critical times each day. Strengthening communication that promotes hygiene and behavioural change may also raise awareness among mothers/caregivers and empower them to enhance handwashing practices at critical times.

Indexed as

DiarrheaToilet FacilitiesAdultCase-Control StudiesChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesEthiopiaFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPrevalenceChildren aged 0–23 monthsDiarrheaMatched case-control studyNortheastern Ethiopia

Identifiers

PMID33789606
PMCPMC8011117
OpenAlexW3148338738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.