Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33789352›Full record

ArticleGenetics2021

Conserved and divergent aspects of Robo receptor signaling and regulation between Drosophila Robo1 and C. elegans SAX-3.

Trent Daiber, Christine J VanderZwan-Butler, Greg J Bashaw, Timothy A Evans

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. microPublication biology · 2024
    Article
  4. Structure and evolution of neuronal wiring receptors and ligands.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Trent DaiberDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.
Christine J VanderZwan-ButlerDepartment of Neuroscience, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Greg J BashawDepartment of Neuroscience, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Timothy A EvansDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.
University of Arkansas at Fayetteville · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Resource Component: Acquisition, maintenance and distribution of Drosophila stocksP40OD018537 · OD · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI Annette L. Parks · 2014 to 2026
$13.5M
Molecular mechanisms of axon guidance receptor regulation and signalingR35NS097340 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BASHAW, GREG J. · 2017 to 2024
$5.8M
Functional analysis of the Drosophila axon guidance receptor Robo2R15NS098406 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS AT FAYETTEVILLE · PI EVANS, TIMOTHY A. · 2016 to 2023
$1.3M
NIH HHS P40 OD018537NINDS NIH HHS R15 NS098406NINDS NIH HHS R35 NS097340
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evolutionarily conserved Roundabout (Robo) family of axon guidance receptors control midline crossing of axons in response to the midline repellant ligand Slit in bilaterian animals including insects, nematodes, and vertebrates. Despite this strong evolutionary conservation, it is unclear whether the signaling mechanism(s) downstream of Robo receptors are similarly conserved. To directly compare midline repulsive signaling in Robo family members from different species, here we use a transgenic approach to express the Robo family receptor SAX-3 from the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans in neurons of the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster. We examine SAX-3's ability to repel Drosophila axons from the Slit-expressing midline in gain of function assays, and test SAX-3's ability to substitute for Drosophila Robo1 during fly embryonic development in genetic rescue experiments. We show that C. elegans SAX-3 is properly translated and localized to neuronal axons when expressed in the Drosophila embryonic CNS, and that SAX-3 can signal midline repulsion in Drosophila embryonic neurons, although not as efficiently as Drosophila Robo1. Using a series of Robo1/SAX-3 chimeras, we show that the SAX-3 cytoplasmic domain can signal midline repulsion to the same extent as Robo1 when combined with the Robo1 ectodomain. We show that SAX-3 is not subject to endosomal sorting by the negative regulator Commissureless (Comm) in Drosophila neurons in vivo, and that peri-membrane and ectodomain sequences are both required for Comm sorting of Drosophila Robo1.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularSignal TransductionAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsConserved SequenceDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsEndosomesGenetic Complementation TestMembrane ProteinsNerve Tissue ProteinsNeuronsProtein TransportReceptors, ImmunologicRoundabout ProteinsCaenorhabditis elegans Proteinscomm protein, DrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsMembrane ProteinsNerve Tissue ProteinsReceptors, ImmunologicRoundabout Proteinsaxon guidanceCaenorhabditis elegansDrosophila melanogastermidline crossingRoboSAX-3Slit

Identifiers

PMID33789352
PMCPMC8045725
OpenAlexW3126741120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.