ArticleGenetics2021
Adaptive gene misregulation.
Article in Genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transcription Factor Promiscuity Drives Regulatory Rewiring and Evolvability in Gene Networks in Bacteria.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Molecular basis for lethal cross-talk between two unrelated bacterial transcription factors - the regulatory protein of a restriction-modification system and the repressor of a defective prophage.Nucleic acids research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Because gene expression is important for evolutionary adaptation, its misregulation is an important cause of maladaptation. A misregulated gene can be incorrectly silent ("off") when a transcription factor (TF) that is required for its activation does not binds its regulatory region. Conversely, a misregulated gene can be incorrectly active ("on") when a TF not normally involved in its activation binds its regulatory region, a phenomenon also known as regulatory crosstalk. DNA mutations that destroy or create TF binding sites on DNA are an important source of misregulation and crosstalk. Although misregulation reduces fitness in an environment to which an organism is well-adapted, it may become adaptive in a new environment. Here, I derive simple yet general mathematical expressions that delimit the conditions under which misregulation can be adaptive. These expressions depend on the strength of selection against misregulation, on the fraction of DNA sequence space filled with TF binding sites, and on the fraction of genes that must be expressed for optimal adaptation. I then use empirical data from RNA sequencing, protein-binding microarrays, and genome evolution, together with population genetic simulations to ask when these conditions are likely to be met. I show that they can be met under realistic circumstances, but these circumstances may vary among organisms and environments. My analysis provides a framework in which improved theory and data collection can help us demonstrate the role of misregulation in adaptation. It also shows that misregulation, like DNA mutation, is one of life's many imperfections that can help propel Darwinian evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.