Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33789222›Full record

ReviewTranslational oncology2021

Remote controlling of CAR-T cells and toxicity management: Molecular switches and next generation CARs.

Ehsan Moghanloo, Hasan Mollanoori, Mohsen Talebi, Salar Pashangzadeh, Fatemeh Faraji, Farimah Hadjilooei, Habibollah Mahmoodzadeh

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. The Tumor Immune Environment: Advances in the Cancer Immunotherapy Era.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Developing a membrane-proximal CD33-targeting CAR T cell.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Immunotherapy of Multiple Myeloma: Current Status as Prologue to the Future.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ehsan MoghanlooCancer Research Center, Cancer Institute of Iran, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.
Hasan MollanooriDepartment of Medical Genetics, Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Tehran, Iran; Medical Genetics Research Center, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Mohsen TalebiSchool of Medicine, West Virginia University, USA.
Salar PashangzadehDepartment of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Fatemeh FarajiCancer Research Center, Cancer Institute of Iran, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.
Farimah HadjilooeiCancer Research Center, Cancer Institute of Iran, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.
Habibollah MahmoodzadehCancer Research Center, Cancer Institute of Iran, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran; Breast Disease Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Electronic address: hmahmoudzadeh2020@gmail.com.
Iran University of Medical Sciences · IRMotamed Cancer Institute · IRUniversity of Tehran · IRWest Virginia University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell-based immunotherapies have been selected for the front-line cancer treatment approaches. Among them, CAR-T cells have shown extraordinary effects in hematologic diseases including chemotherapy-resistant acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). In this approach, autologous T cells isolated from the patient's body genetically engineered to express a tumor specific synthetic receptor against a tumor antigen, then these cells expanded ex vivo and re-infusion back to the patient body. Recently, significant clinical response and high rates of complete remission of CAR T cell therapy in B-cell malignancies led to the approval of Kymriah and Yescarta (CD19-directed CAR-T cells) were by FDA for treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Despite promising therapeutic outcomes, CAR T cells also can elicit the immune-pathologic effects, such as Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS), Tumor Lysis Syndrome (TLS), and on-target off-tumor toxicity, that hampered its application. Ineffective control of these highly potent synthetic cells causes discussed potentially life-threatening toxicities, so researchers have developed several mechanisms to remote control CAR T cells. In this paper, we briefly review the introduced toxicities of CAR-T cells, then describe currently existing control approaches and review their procedure, pros, and cons.

Indexed as

CAR-T cellsMolecular switchesRemote controllingToxicity management

Identifiers

PMID33789222
PMCPMC8027274
OpenAlexW3139824450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.