Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33788884›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Characterizing COVID-19 clinical phenotypes and associated comorbidities and complication profiles.

Elizabeth R Lusczek, Nicholas E Ingraham, Basil S Karam, Jennifer Proper, Lianne Siegel, Erika S Helgeson, Sahar Lotfi-Emran, Emily J Zolfaghari, Emma Jones, Michael G Usher and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pathophysiological Mechanisms in Long COVID: A Mixed Method Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Elizabeth R LusczekDepartment of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America.
Nicholas E IngrahamDepartment of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0292-0594
Basil S KaramDepartment of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1222-0380
Jennifer ProperDivision of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America.
Lianne SiegelDivision of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America.
Erika S HelgesonDivision of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America.
Sahar Lotfi-EmranDepartment of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America.
Emily J ZolfaghariUniversity of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America.
Emma JonesDepartment of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America.
Michael G UsherDepartment of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America.
Jeffrey G ChipmanDepartment of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America.
R Adams DudleyDepartment of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America.
Bradley BensonDepartment of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America.
Genevieve B MeltonDepartment of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America.
Anthony CharlesDepartment of Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.
Monica I LupeiDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8513-4061
Christopher J TignanelliDepartment of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America.

Funding

University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR002494 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R, WEISDORF, DANIEL J · 2018 to 2022
$34.9M
TRAINING-PULMONARY CELL &MOLECULAR BIOLOGY &PHYSIOLOGYT32HL007741 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI DUDLEY, R. ADAMS, INGBAR, DAVID H · 1994 to 2023
$13.9M
Minnesota Learning Health System Mentored Career Development Program (MN-LHS)K12HS026379 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BEEBE, TIMOTHY, LINZER, MARK · 2018 to 2022
$2.9M
Health Information Exchange Utilization and Inter-hospital Transfer OutcomesR01HS026732 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI USHER, MICHAEL G. · 2019 to 2022
$1.3M
Training in Biostatistics for Heart, Lung and Blood Disease ResearchT32HL129956 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI NEATON, JAMES DENNIS · 2016 to 2020
$1.1M
AHRQ HHS K12 HS026379AHRQ HHS R01 HS026732NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002494NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007741NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL129956
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeHeterogeneity has been observed in outcomes of hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Identification of clinical phenotypes may facilitate tailored therapy and improve outcomes. The purpose of this study is to identify specific clinical phenotypes across COVID-19 patients and compare admission characteristics and outcomes.

methodsThis is a retrospective analysis of COVID-19 patients from March 7, 2020 to August 25, 2020 at 14 U.S. hospitals. Ensemble clustering was performed on 33 variables collected within 72 hours of admission. Principal component analysis was performed to visualize variable contributions to clustering. Multinomial regression models were fit to compare patient comorbidities across phenotypes. Multivariable models were fit to estimate associations between phenotype and in-hospital complications and clinical outcomes.

resultsThe database included 1,022 hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Three clinical phenotypes were identified (I, II, III), with 236 [23.1%] patients in phenotype I, 613 [60%] patients in phenotype II, and 173 [16.9%] patients in phenotype III. Patients with respiratory comorbidities were most commonly phenotype III (p = 0.002), while patients with hematologic, renal, and cardiac (all p<0.001) comorbidities were most commonly phenotype I. Adjusted odds of respiratory, renal, hepatic, metabolic (all p<0.001), and hematological (p = 0.02) complications were highest for phenotype I. Phenotypes I and II were associated with 7.30-fold (HR:7.30, 95% CI:(3.11-17.17), p<0.001) and 2.57-fold (HR:2.57, 95% CI:(1.10-6.00), p = 0.03) increases in hazard of death relative to phenotype III.

conclusionWe identified three clinical COVID-19 phenotypes, reflecting patient populations with different comorbidities, complications, and clinical outcomes. Future research is needed to determine the utility of these phenotypes in clinical practice and trial design.

Indexed as

PhenotypeAgedComorbidityCOVID-19FemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID33788884
PMCPMC8011766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.