ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2021
Changes in Relative Fundamental Frequency Under Increased Cognitive Load in Individuals With Healthy Voices.
Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Normative Thresholds for Acoustic Estimates of Relative Fundamental Frequency.Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation · 2025Article
- Automated Analysis of Relative Fundamental Frequency in Continuous Speech: Development and Comparison of Three Processing Pipelines.Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation · 2025Article
- Potential Biophysiological Mechanisms Underlying Vocal Demands and Vocal Fatigue.Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation · 2025Review
- Effects of a Concurrent Working Memory Task on Speech Acoustics in Parkinson's Disease.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2024Article
- Effects of Cognitive Stress on Voice Acoustics in Individuals With Hyperfunctional Voice Disorders.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of cognitive load on relative fundamental frequency (RFF) in individuals with healthy voices. Method Twenty adults with healthy voices read sentences under different cognitive load conditions. Each sentence contained color terms printed in colored ink, creating an embedded Stroop task. Participants read the ink color in which a word was printed, rather than the color term itself. Sentences with mismatched ink colors and printed words constituted an increased cognitive load. RFF, an acoustic correlate of laryngeal tension, was calculated for the 10 voicing cycles preceding (i.e., offset) and following (i.e., onset) voiceless consonants. Repeated measures analyses of variance were constructed to assess the effects of RFF cycle, cognitive load, and their interaction on mean RFF offset and onset. Results There was a significant effect of cognitive load condition on RFF offset. There was no significant effect of condition on RFF onset nor significant interaction between cycle and condition on RFF onset or offset values. Conclusion Reduced mean RFF offset may indicate an increase in laryngeal muscle tension during a cognitively demanding task.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.