Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33788595›Full record

ArticleJCO global oncology2021

User Experience With Low-Cost Virtual Reality Cancer Surgery Simulation in an African Setting.

Eric G Bing, Megan L Brown, Anthony Cuevas, Richard Sullivan, Groesbeck P Parham

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO global oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence in Gynecologic Oncology Education: Insights from a Qualitative Study Using Semi-Structured Interviews.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Orthopaedic Hand Surgical Simulation Training: A Review.Journal of hand and microsurgery · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Eric G BingDepartment of Applied Physiology and Wellness, Center for Global Health Impact, Simmons School of Education and Human Development, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX.ORCID 0000-0002-3538-795X
Megan L BrownDepartment of Anthropology, Dedman College of Humanities and Sciences, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX.ORCID 0000-0002-2677-4894
Anthony CuevasSimulation Laboratory, Department of Teaching and Learning, Simmons School of Education and Human Development, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX.
Richard SullivanInstitute of Cancer Policy, King's College London, Kings Health Partners Comprehensive Cancer Centre, School of Cancer Sciences, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6435-1825
Groesbeck P ParhamDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, UNC School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel, Chapel Hill, NC.ORCID 0000-0001-5922-5990
Southern Methodist University · USKing's College London · GBUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/P025420/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 215723/Z/19/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLimited access to adequate cancer surgery training is one of the driving forces behind global inequities in surgical cancer care. Affordable virtual reality (VR) surgical training could enhance surgical skills in low- and middle-income settings, but most VR and augmented reality systems are too expensive and do not teach open surgical techniques commonly practiced in these contexts. New low-cost VR can offer skill development simulations relevant to these settings, but little is known about how knowledge is gained and applied by surgeons training and working in specific resource-constrained settings. This study addresses this gap, exploring gynecologic oncology trainee learning and user experience using a low-cost VR simulator to learn to perform an open radical abdominal hysterectomy in Lusaka, Zambia.

methodsEleven surgical trainees rotating through the gynecologic oncology service were sequentially recruited from the University Teaching Hospital in Lusaka to participate in a study evaluating a VR radical abdominal hysterectomy training designed to replicate the experience in a Zambian hospital. Six participated in semi-structured interviews following the training. Interviews were analyzed using open and axial coding, informed by grounded theory.

resultsSimulator participation increased participants' perception of their surgical knowledge, confidence, and skills. Participants believed their skills transferred to other related surgical procedures. Having clear goals and motivation to improve were described as factors that influenced success.

conclusionFor cancer surgery trainees in lower-resourced settings learning medical and surgical skills, even for those with limited VR experience, low-cost VR simulators may enhance anatomical knowledge and confidence. The VR simulator reinforced anatomical and clinical knowledge acquired through other modalities. VR-enhanced learning may be particularly valuable when mentored learning opportunities are limited.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsVirtual RealityClinical CompetenceComputer SimulationFemaleHumansLearningZambia

Identifiers

PMID33788595
PMCPMC8081482
OpenAlexW3141645359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.