Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33788373›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2021

Involving an individual with lived-experience in a co-analysis of qualitative data.

Laura Hemming, Daniel Pratt, Peer Bhatti, Jennifer Shaw, Gillian Haddock

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Bridging Lived and Expert Experience: A Qualitative Study Exploring Lived-Experience Experts' and Researchers' Experiences of Public Engagement in Cancer Research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Evaluation of Public Involvement in Doctoral Research Using a Four-Dimensional Theoretical Framework.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  10. Strengthening mental health research outcomes through genuine partnerships with young people with lived or living experience: A pilot evaluation study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Research Buddy partnership in a MD-PhD program: lessons learned.Research involvement and engagement · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Involving an individual with lived-experience in a co-analysis of qualitative data.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Laura HemmingDivision of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8818-9802
Daniel PrattDivision of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Peer BhattiDivision of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Jennifer ShawDivision of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Gillian HaddockDivision of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N013751/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople with lived-experience of the phenomenon under investigation are seldom involved in the analysis of qualitative data, and there exists little guidance for those wishing to involve contributors at this stage of research.

aimsTo critically reflect on the process of involving people with lived-experience in a thematic analysis and to offer direction to other researchers.

methodsAn individual with lived-experience of residing in prison contributed to a co-analysis of qualitative data using thematic analysis. This paper reports on involvement at each stage of a thematic analysis and follows an established reporting checklist.

resultsA number of challenges and benefits were encountered in the process of co-analysing the data. These are discussed in relation to previous research and how to overcome the challenges encountered.

conclusionsThe paper concludes by giving recommendations and guidance for future researchers wishing to involve people with lived-experience in qualitative data analysis.

Indexed as

Research DesignResearch PersonnelHumansQualitative ResearchforensicPatient and public involvementqualitativethematic analysis

Identifiers

PMID33788373
PMCPMC8235892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.