Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33788299›Full record

ArticleLetters in applied microbiology2021

Comparison of novel approaches for expedited pathogen identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing against routine blood culture diagnostics.

L Knabl, S Huber, C Lass-Flörl, S Fuchs

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Letters in applied microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

L KnablInstitute of Hygiene and Medical Microbiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
S HuberInstitute of Hygiene and Medical Microbiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
C Lass-FlörlInstitute of Hygiene and Medical Microbiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
S FuchsInstitute of Hygiene and Medical Microbiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8519-0701
Innsbruck Medical University · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blood stream infections pose a major challenge for clinicians as the immediate application of an appropriate antibiotic treatment is the vital factor to safe the patients' lives. This preliminary study compares three different systems promising fast pathogen identification and susceptibility testing in comparison to conventional blood culture (BC): (i) the rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing protocol according to EUCAST in combination with the Sepsityper

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaBacterial Typing TechniquesBlood CultureHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsSepsisAnti-Bacterial Agentsantibiotic resistanceblood culturepathogen identificationrapid antimicrobial susceptibility testingsepsis

Identifiers

PMID33788299
PMCPMC8252793
OpenAlexW3141780521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.