ArticleEJNMMI physics2021
Effect of quantitative values on shortened acquisition duration in brain tumor
Article in EJNMMI physics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Imaging of Small Lung Nodules on Modern SAFOV and LAFOV PET in Combination With Data-driven Motion Correction: Implications for Current Practice.Clinical nuclear medicine · 2026Article
- Reducing acquisition time in O-(2-Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Impact of the new ultra-high sensitivity mode in a long axial field-of-view PET/CT.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2023Article
- Next-Generation Molecular Imaging of Thyroid Cancer.Cancers · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe amount of signal decreases when the acquisition duration is shortened. However, it is not clear how this affects the quantitative values. This study aims to clarify the effect of acquisition time shortening in brain tumor PET/CT using
methodThis study was a retrospective analysis of 30 patients who underwent clinical
resultsSUVmax, MTV, and TNRmax showed the highest values due to the effects of statistical noise when the acquisition time was 1 min. These values were stable when the acquisition duration was > 6 min. SUVpeak and SUVmean showed mostly consistent values regardless of duration.
conclusionsSUVmax, MTV, and TNRmax are affected by acquisition time. If the acquisition duration was > 6 min, the fluctuation could be suppressed within 5% in these quantitative values. However, SUVpeak was suggested to be a robust index regardless of the acquisition duration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.